Home

Advertisement

What You Say?

  • Aug. 27th, 2009 at 5:49 AM

"Ten years from now we're going to be sorry we're doing this [but] it has to be done."- Quote attributed to anonymous CIA officer from recently released report on agency abuse of detainees.

I know many on the left are upset with Obama's progress and I don't blame them, for the most part, but I have to say, while I expected something like this to come out eventually, I had no idea it would be so soon. And again, I know some expected it to surface on Day Two, but, let's face it, that was never going to happen. This is certainly one place where conservatives should outright plotz over the idea of bureaucracy and red tape, because it contributes so much more time for gassing up the getaway car and getting the stories straight.

But I'm not here to talk about that; I'm more interested in briefly examining that quote. People often like to brush aside semantics, but you can sometimes tell just as much from the way someone says something as you can from what they say. While the above is, coming from a person who operated under the aegis of the Boy King, a remarkably honest statement, notice that it's still a dodge. It's still very much in keeping with the neo-con philosophy.

A true admission might have gone, "Our reasons are just and our motives are pure, but the truth is that what we are doing is illegal and morally unsound." "Unsound." You like that? How's that for a big old benefit of the doubt? (Along with all the rest of it for that matter.) And yet the placing of the self-stroking before the confessional does actually matter. Because the other way, he's basically letting himself off the hook. Not much more than assuaging his own conscience. This was (is) the neo-con language. English has no subjunctive; Neo-Con has no admissive. Or perhaps what we are witnessing here is the extremely rare "soft admissive." A confessionary tense that somehow still ends up asking you to kiss the speaker's ass.

One day I'd like to see one of these people - one of the big dogs would be great, but I may have a better chance of seeing a UFO - come out and admit the monstrous nature of what took place. Couch in it terms of how unbelievably awful some of the people you were pursuing were - that part is true after all - but do us all a favor and put that part first. Let us all know that you now realize that becoming those people you hated so much was a bad idea. A bad, bad idea.

But I have a feeling that's where the really long wait kicks in.

Poison Smiles

  • May. 25th, 2009 at 1:55 AM

I belong to a few small online forums, and one in particular is particularly small. It doesn't even have a theme per se; just a number of people who met at another forum and eventually gravitated to a smaller place. Two things are relevant to the rest of this: 1) we do talk about politics and we are all fairly liberal and 2) to keep the place free we are subjected to adbots, meaning that the pages upon which we talk politics get political ads.

Regrettably, the adbots are tone deaf and subsequently quite a few of the ads we get skew conservative. (I've never taken the time to calculate a ratio, but if I had to guess, I'd say we get more rightist ads than lefitst, although that may just be my own awareness of the biases of our corporatized culture talking.) It's annoying, but generally tolerable. After all, it's not as if I didn't already know that divergent views were out there. But today I saw one that really pushed my buttons because I cannot for the life of me fathom how anyone could be be happy to be represented by such a thing.

The thing starts out by announcing that New York State is on the verge of legalizing same-sex marriage (I still can't believe Iowa beat us to it, but, I tip my hat to them nonetheless). It then fades to the next screen, which basically says, "Is that what you want?" and then urges people to contact their state senators. Now, described as such, it's not especially egregious (you know, apart from the inherent bigotry). What  really pisses me off is the accompanying graphics on the second screen. We see a man and woman and their young son with their heads all scrunched together and smiling fit to split their skulls.

The implication is more than clear. "Oh, just look at how ponies-butterflies-and-rainbows happy we are! Daddy's raise at the cotton candy factory just came through, which means we can finally afford that vacation to Elfworld where we will tip all of the waiters with eskimo kisses!" (Storm clouds would now appear above.) "Oh, but how shall we relax on our vacation when we know that there are yucky people out there who are actually considering treating the homos as if they were human beings! Well, that would just make us so sad! All the flowers would wilt and the fountains would dry up and the kitties and puppies and bunnies would get the runs!!"

Admittedly, I wax hyperbolic, but with good reason. I am a pacifistic man, but this shit makes me want to punch someone. How in the fuck could anyone think it a noble thing to suggest that your happiness is contingent on someone else being demeaned? I have yet to hear an argument against marriage equality that doesn't crumble under scrutiny, but this one comes to us pre-crumbled. There is simply no sense or decency in the suggestion that people you don't know being granted rights you yourself believe to be an essential part of life will somehow impact your own enjoyment of those rights. Even, once again, putting aside the repugnant bigotry of it all, why would someone wish to cheapen something they hold so dear by insisting that the fabric of it is so delicate it can be shredded by others justly enjoying it as well. Marriage is not a pool that everyone has to swim in. That's kind of the point. It's two loving individuals building a pool of their own.

I actually began writing this before the California Supreme Court's extremely disappointing decision to uphold Proposition 8, but that decision made the post just that much more relevant. Those of us who value justice and equality may have cause to be angry at this decision, but we can get some comfort in knowing that, as with most progressive causes, time is on our side. With each successive generation, the prejudices of the past become less and less prevelant and subsequently less and less relevant. And we move closer and closer to the day when someone who would use a picture of domestic happiness as a means to deny the same to someone else will be too ashamed to even try.

Porous Was She

  • Apr. 18th, 2009 at 4:07 AM



While channel-surfing the other day, I happened across an episode of Spongebob Squarepants. I hadn’t seen the show for a while and as I was watching it, an amusing memory surfaced.

 

I used to work in a video store. This was before the DVD revolution, so we trafficked mostly in tapes. After several years behind the counter, I was promoted to assistant to the owner, which was a blessing as it minimized my exposure to the clientele, leaving them primarily for the younger employees to deal with. And owing to certain factors, the demeanor of said clientele undoubtedly being one of them, we had a relatively frequent turnaround in counter staff during my tenure. Some of them came from a pretty well-known acting school around the corner – in fact, speaking of Nickelodeon, one of them went on to host a very popular show for pre-schoolers – and some of them came from the neighborhood. Lizz was one of the latter.

 

Most of the people who worked there over the years were, at the very least, nice. We did have some bumps in the road, including a guy who it turned out was slowly spiriting tapes out of the store for his private collection and who only returned a small portion of them when he was caught (the loss of Blood Freak hit me particularly hard) and a guy whose standard argument whenever there was a disagreement about the quality of a film was that he had a different (read: better) perspective because he had been to film school; not an invalid position, but also not an inviolable trump card either, especially coming from a guy who’d probably never even seen Blood Freak. But Lizz was something special. A whipsmart, creative, quite beautiful punk rock chick, she was pretty much what I would have custom-ordered in a fellow employee, if such a thing were possible. Actually, fuck ‘fellow employee,’ she was pretty much what I’ve always looked for in a girlfriend, and if there hadn’t been a significant enough age difference between us to kind of matter, I might have explored that possibility.

 

(Side note. They did screw up my order in one way: she was, improbably enough, a Republican. This was actually the second time in my life I felt affection for a punk rock chick only to find out she swung to the right, though this one was slightly easier to take, as the first one had been a bona-fidey love situation. Interestingly, both instances also resolved themselves the same way. In each case, it turned out that the impressionable young woman had basically been aping her parents’ beliefs, and a little independent thought eventually sent her 180-ing towards good old humanistic liberalism. But I digress.)

 

Having Lizz around the store made the place a lot easier to take, and even fun at times. Case in point: her decision one day to cast the assorted employees as characters from Spongebob. Two of her choices were remarkably a propos. The store subbing for the Krusty Krab, the owner would be Mr. Krabs, and, boy, did our boss live up to his, shall we say, rigid pecuniary attitude. Similarly, one of the other clerks had both the dour disposition and shiny be-stubbled pate of Squidward. To be fair, he wasn’t actually a miserable person at all, but when he was in complaining mode, the resemblance became far greater. Never more so than when Lizz informed him of her casting choice.

 

Lizz herself would take the title role, and the thought of her in that outfit was both hilarious and disconcertingly sexy. But as this reminiscence washed over me, I realized that I couldn’t remember which role I was supposed to occupy. I thought maybe Patrick – not the most becoming assignation given the limited brainpower of Spongebob’s starfish friend – but that didn’t seem right. The smallest and most evil of Bikini Bottom’s residents, Plankton, could have been fun, but I was pretty sure that wasn’t it either.

 

And then I remembered that she had given me a part of particularly high prestige indeed. She wanted me to be Gary, Spongebob’s pet snail. I believe she even justified it by saying that Gary tends not to say too much, but is actually the smartest one in the room, a flattering if undeserved comparison. Now while I would have gladly worn a shell on my back if it meant I could have sat in Lizz’s lap while she tickled my eyestalks, the truth of her choice probably lay within the fact that, even though she was in high school and I was pushing 30, she seemed to connect with me more than with anyone else in the store. Despite Gary’s comparatively infrequent appearances, it was a matter of the significance of the part overshadowing its size, which took a small joke meant to kill a little time during a dreary routine and turned it into a genuine moment, a pleasure both to experience and remember.

 

And so, Lizz, from Warped Memory Lane to wherever you are now, I hope you are happy, prosperous and well, and I say with all sincerity:

 

“Meow!”

Two Left Fate

  • Mar. 20th, 2009 at 3:02 AM

 

New York Aberrant, March 14, 2009

 

While some may disdain the increase in public security cameras (and let’s not even get into the worldwide amateur film festival that has resulted from all the cell phones out there), what society at large has lost from the sense of constant scrutiny has been a gain for us here at the Aberrant in as much as we are now sometimes able to back up our stories of hiccupping reality with actual video evidence. [And I can already hear the Underwoods being fired up for letters in defense of the purely anecdotal. -Ed.]

            Case in point: the whimsical near-fate of baked goods deliveryman Victor Dueñas. A native New Yorker, Dueñas has been schlepping bread and assorted pastries for Brooklyn’s Dough Remy Bakery for decades. He feels completely at home behind the wheel of his truck and is made to feel likewise in the various stops around his route. It’s the in-between that preyed on his mind. Or rather two very specific parts of the in-between: fire escape ladders and metal basement doors in the sidewalk.

            “It’s kinda dumb, and I wish I could say it comes from something in my childhood or something, but the truth is I don’t really know when these fears started. I vaguely remember that the fire escape thing kinda started as a notion – you know, something that just occurred to me – that just stuck, and then I couldn’t be close to one without thinking about it.”

            Dueñas, 46, is a thin-haired man with a small pencil mustache. Physically, he’s of fair size, much of it muscle, but even those well-equipped to deal with the city’s human dangers are still prone to certain universal factors, such as gravity. And along the way, Dueñas found that he couldn’t pass underneath a fire escape ladder without worrying that it was going to fall suddenly and crack open his skull. Similarly, he found that passing over a metal basement door in the sidewalk also suffused him with the fear that it was going to open up beneath him, sending him plunging down metal steps or onto a concrete floor covered in the kind of grime that makes the sidewalks seem positively lickable, not that he’d care since his neck would be broken.

            “It can be embarrassing,” he continues. “I mean, it’s not usually that difficult to avoid walking over one or under the other, but it does happen that it becomes unavoidable – these streets can get crowded, y’know – and if someone sees you making special pains to walk around them, well, it can lead to uncomfortable questions. Especially since I knew – or thought I knew – that it was largely irrational.”

            So uncomfortable did it make him that he vowed to overcome both fears, and with a little personal strength (and a little therapy) he was successful. Which makes what happened this past Tuesday all the more ironic.

            “I’m in Murray Hill, making a delivery at one of my regular stops, a Korean deli. I’ve dropped off the shipment and I’m walking out just as these two young ladies are about to walk in. So I step to the side to get outta their way. Suddenly I hear a, I don’t know, a kind of a cracking sound above me. I look up. The goddamn ladder- ‘scuse me, the ladder from the fire escape is falling right towards my head. Now everything seems to be in slow motion, although it actually happened so fast, I didn’t even have a chance to react. My brain is screaming run, but before I can even move, I realize that the ladder is falling, but it’s not getting any closer. And that’s when I notice the strange feeling beneath my feet, which, it turns out, is because there ain’t nothing there!”

            Yes, indeed, both of Mr. Dueñas’s bygone fears came true at once. The ladder above him fell and the door to the basement of the deli, upon which he had unwittingly stepped, opened, simultaneously. And the timing couldn’t have been more perfect, since the fall into the basement, where he landed on some soft bags of garbage, prevented the ladder from cleaving his brainbox in twain. He emerged from the basement somewhat slimy, but unhurt.

            “My ma, God bless her, thinks it’s a miracle. The funny thing is, having successfully put those fears behind me in the past, I’m disinclined to think of it as anything more than wild coincidence and dumb luck.”

            And in other dumb luck news, one of the security cameras inside the deli managed to capture the entire incident through the window, lending credence to what might otherwise be dismissed as shag of the dog. Aside from Mr. Dueñas’s disappearing act, additional entertainment can be had in the reaction of the two girls for whom he stepped aside, as the startled reaction of one sends the other careening through the door and into a stand of individual-sized snack packets. Footage available exclusively at the Aberrant website for those in search of a glorious example of random order or just a good cheap laugh.

 



Note: The Aberrant is, for the nonce, a fictional newspaper. No such publication exists. Yet.

Just a Little Light

  • Jan. 31st, 2009 at 9:18 PM


Note bene: Despite the spate of recent entries, this was never intended to be a political blog, not exclusively anyway, but it was intended to be updated far more regularly than it has been. I have no problem writing about politics when that’s what’s on my mind (and will prove as much in a minute), but I’m also going to try to be a bit more varied, especially as I have some new ideas, along with some old ones only scantily utilized, that I hope will turn into regular features, most of which will definitely be on the lighter side.

 

And now…

 

The Fox show 24 has recently started its seventh season, and once again the world it inhabits has been plunged into a chaotic frenzy. The producers have always managed to finesse at least a little bit of real world relevance into their fictional plots, creating a kind of parallel universe to our own (not a bad time to mention that they got the first black president into office at least seven years before we were able to, and they’ve just checked off the first female president column as well) and this time it’s based around the idea of genocidal militias in a made-up African nation.

 

I have been a fan of this show since its inception. Even in the lesser seasons, and skirting around the stupider plot diversions, it consistently delivers some crackling espionage action, and that’s coming from someone who isn’t a particular fan of either spy stories or action movies, although that’s not even the biggest reason why I’m a somewhat unlikely adherent.

 

For those unaware, the show has come under fire on numerous occasions, particularly in the liberal blogosphere and from human rights groups (the latter of which shouldn’t be exclusively liberal, but it seems to work out that way) for its persistent depiction of torture as an effective tactic. To read a really terrific article about the entire subject, go here. (And I would add how satisfying it is that the case for the negative effects of such things is actually unintentionally bolstered by some of the comments of those who would deny it. Question: How do you discredit a conservative? Answer: Turn on his microphone.)

 

But the truth is, the show is not, as might be concluded from the torture issue, a platform for conservative philosophies. Crackling espionage action or not, I simply couldn't have stomached it this long if it were. As is mentioned in the article, one of the creator/producers is a diehard rightist (friends with the High Priest of Gas and Nazi Barbie, and he’s in good company given some of the shit that comes out of his mouth), but the writing staff is, overall, quite mixed politically. And while they do tend to stack the deck in regards to the US being the good guys (not an entirely unrealistic thing, it should be said), they haven’t been afraid to show that the mere act of sitting in the Oval Office does not suffuse you with righteousness, nor have they shied away from characters debating the wisdom of ever-troublesome interventionism and the possible motives behind same.

 

Nor, for that matter, have they ignored the torture issue, though the debate generally ends the same way: with the exact sort of ticking clock scenario experts tell us never happens in real life forcing whoever had a problem with it to realize the error of their ways and consent to the sort of tactics experts tell us don’t really work.

 

This new season even opens with the main character, Jack Bauer (Kiefer Sutherland), appearing before a Senate Committee to answer questions about the tactics he has regularly employed. This seemed at first to be a beneficial byproduct of conversations the producers and the show’s star have had with human rights groups, particularly regarding the fact that soldiers in the field have used the same tactics they’ve seen on the show, to the consternation of their superiors. Unfortunately, and I’m a little behind in the episodes so I can’t say whether this part of the story has been further addressed at all, the hearing consists mainly of Bauer telling off the committee members and basically saying ‘non, je ne regrette rien’ (pardon my traitorous French) while the ghost of John Philip Sousa conducts some stirring patriotic music behind him. This was not, I would imagine, what a certain subsection of the audience was hoping to see, although who knows what the future may bring? Famed liberal mouthpiece and comedienne Janeane Garafalo is in the cast this time around and Human Rights Watch aired an ad during the season premiere, both of which are testament to the fact that the show’s politics are not as cut and dried as they may seem and may even be indicative of something else. I guess we’ll see.

 

But the truth is, the main reason I sat down and started typing this in the first place is because of a moment from hour two of this season. Jack has been swept out of the Senate hearing to assist the FBI in a matter the details of which will already be known to those who watch the show and won’t matter to those who don’t. Some of the Feds working on the case are not too crazy having him around owing to his dangerous reputation, but he endures their barely-veiled hostility. Ordered to sit inside a car and be quiet at one point, the agent watching over him turns and expresses belief that it’s wrong that Bauer has been forced before the Senate. After all, this is a man who has saved the nation at least six times (available at a DVD retailer near you). Jack looks out of the window wistfully and responds:

 

“It’s better that everything comes out in the open. We’ve done so many secret things over the years in the name of protecting this country, we’ve created two worlds. Ours, and the people we’ve promised to protect. They deserve to know the truth. Then they can decide how far they want to let us go.”

 

And so, for that one moment at least, all questions of ideological agenda become irrelevant. You can choose to decide how the public really would react if put in charge of that decision (and, of course, results may vary, for any number of reasons), but the simple fact remains that, with that statement, Jack Bauer was more honest about the fact that things such as torture, secret prisons, extraordinary rendition and the like do affect the conscience of the nation at large than the Bush administration, or indeed any of the administrations that proceeded it, have ever been.

 

As to the one that follows it, well, we’re off to a good start. Again, I guess we’ll see.

Out of Season

  • Jan. 1st, 2009 at 10:23 PM


Once again, the holidays are gone with but a few fumes remaining. Soon, everything will go back to "normal." Which puts me in mind of the most trenchant thing I read this season. It was in an e-mail from one of the far-too-many activist lists I'm on. I wish I could remember which group it was because it really put the skeeball right in the center hole.

The author, by way of season's greetings, mentioned how funny it was being an anti-war, pro-peace activist at this time of year and hearing "Peace on Earth" coming out of everyone's mouth. Out of the mouths of those who, throughout the rest of the year, can't be bothered to do anything in the name of genuine peace, who seem generally unconcerned that our nation is waging war in one country and occupying another, something that should occupy all of us whether we approve of the actions or not. Even more difficult to stomach is the thought of "Peace on Earth" coming out of the mouths of those who otherwise spend their time thwarting peace at every turn. I have no doubt that the White House puts on a stunning Christmas display, or that the current occupants are the least qualifed to speak about the holiday's ostensible message.

Why, it should be asked, did so many people laugh when Dennis Kucinich suggested that this nation needs a Department of Peace just as much if not more than we need a Department of War? Isn't peace something we want? Isn't it something to be desired? Isn't it, indeed, the ultimate objective behind war?

Even most of the hawks would say yes to that; they may or may not mean it, but they'd likely say it, because what are they going to do? Admit that they really work in service of a dangerously entrenched industry that happily profits off of human misery? Admit that in their circle, perpetual war isn't only acceptable, it's desirable? You would think that those who have seen combat would know better than anyone else that it may sometimes be a necessary thing, but can't possibly be considered a good thing.

Ah, but then, most of the hawks in the current administration never saw any combat, did they? Yes, that could explain it. 'It' being the ability to act as if peace were merely a word to be trotted out at the traditional time, and then discarded again as easily as if it were embroidered on a pillow. Not to get too Charlie Brown Christmas on you, but what if people lived their lives as if peace were something important all year long? Important enough to be a major concern of our government. Important enough to warrant its own department. Is that really such a joke? Is it really that funny?

Happy New Year.

Because I Say So

  • Dec. 22nd, 2008 at 3:27 AM


So, we learned from the shoe-throwing incident that President Not Brussell Sprout has good reflexes, but who knew he was so limber as well? You'd practically have to be a goddamn yogi to kiss your own ass so thoroughly.

Of course, before he even made this grandiosely self-serving statement, there was already plenty of evidence that not only hadn't he made things better but had likely made them worse, such as that detailed in this terrific article by Terrance Heath for the Institute for America's Future.

"It's not a matter of luck," he says. Well, then, sir, what is it exactly? Because going by your overall record, we can rule out skill and insight and acumen and wisdom and thoroughness and thoughtfulness and knowledge and strategy and somebody else please take over so I can take a breath.

But what really bugs me about that statement - and I realize this is somewhat unfair since I didn't hear how he actually said it - is that I can only imagine him saying it in that same snickering tone he always uses when he's being defensive. You know, the one with the not-so-subtle subtext of "I can't believe I have to explain this to you dummies! You're just supposed to go along with whatever I say!" Is it any wonder that Sarah Palin was so sure she was qualified to hold an office that close to the top? Look at the example being set.

The truth is that if Bush were so confident that history will vindicate him, he wouldn't be pressing so hard to create a narrative now about how successful his presidency has been. This is likely the deep-seated lack of confidence that many people point to and say, "He's not actually an idiot; he just doesn't deal well with stress." Putting aside the fact that this is not the most desirable quality for the leader of the free world, the punchline is that by this point it doesn't even really matter any more. Sure, we can continue to debate the liar/idiot question until the day when definitive proof comes out one way or the other. But none of that is going to change the state of the world post-Bush. Hopefully what we do from here on in, will.


I was listening to Ron Kuby's Air America show yesterday and a caller suggested that, now that the election has been won, perhaps it's time to lay off Sarah Palin. I understand the sentiment and think it's a decent one at heart, but I do think that it's important to remember that she is still being touted by some Republicans as the future of their party. Seeing as how she's also exactly the sort of person that many other, more sensible Republicans are sick of being associated with, I don't know that this is how things will play out (perhaps, as a friend suggested, this is the road to a genuine third party emerging; pity it's highly unlikely to be one I would vote for, but precedent is precedent). Additionally, keep in mind that it is Republicans - not Democrats, progressives, liberals, what have you - who are now loosing the dish on her like she was caught panty-less at the prom.
 
But I'm not even going to comment, for the time being, about the latest allegations of her ignorance, which, if true, are really quite mind-boggling. We all know that public rhetoric is often about finessing words so you can say one thing while appearing to say another, or at the very least affording yourself "plausible deniability." This is a practice that, while repugnant on its face, can, like any good con, evoke a certain reluctant admiration when done with genuine skill. But there is manipulating language, and then there's plain old misusing it, as in, "That doen't mean what you appear to think it means." In the specific case I'm thinking of, the word would be 'filter.'

During her memorable appearance at the Vice Presidential debate, Governor Palin said how happy she was to be able to speak to the public directly without the "filter" of the media. This was, as I'm sure everyone recalls, in reference to several bad if not outright disastrous public appearances, perhaps the most noteworthy of which was her interview with Katie Couric.

Now, a filter, to put it as simply as possible, is a device through which a substance is passed when you wish to separate one or more elements of the substance from the others. (I'd cite an actual dictionary definition, but I'd worry about being accused of bias. Noah Webster would almost certainly be viewed as a radical by many modern conservatives.) Ironically, while Governor Palin complains that what she said was filtered, indeed, when we look back on what actally happened, we see that her true complaint was that they didn't filter her enough.

Bear in mind that the Saturday Night Live segment satirizing the Couric interview was taken almost verbatim from what she actually said. They allowed her to be shown as is, she came off very badly, and she wasn't happy about it. But, of course, she couldn't complain about what actually happened, so she had to pretend that things had happened differently. This scenario gives her the benefit of the doubt that she did understand what happened, she does know the meaning of the word 'filter,' and she willfully chose to misuse it. Basically we come down to the same choice we've had so many times with W for these past eight years. Liar or moron.

One thing that propels me towards the former, all recent evidence of cluelessness aside, is that I get a very palpable sense of entitlement from the Governor. It has already been established that she did abuse her power for personal reasons, even though she stated publicly that she had been exonerated (there's that whole opposite thing again), and while the rumors that she and her kin went off like contestants on Supermarket Sweep as soon as the RNC checkbook came out make them sound like rubes, her general air of superiority makes me think more of Madeleine Khan as Empress Nympho casually ticking off which guards she wants for the evening's festivities (minus the impeccable comic timing and group sex). It is not at all difficult for me to believe that she believed that it was the media's job to make her look good no matter what she said. Sucks for her that they finally figured out that it wasn't.

As I said before, this is nothing new. It did feel like this sort of thing happened in especially egregious numbers this time around but that may just have been because I was paying closer attention. Now that the whole nerve-wracking experience has turned a corner, I may go back and see if I can address some of the other glaring examples. Just for fun? You betcha. (An on that overly easy note...)

Halloween Report 2008

  • Nov. 4th, 2008 at 3:51 AM


Who knew? I had reasonably begun to suspect that the fear aspect of Halloween was largely a bygone thing for me and yet another Halloween was upon us and I was undeniably freaked out. But enough about the election.

 

Actually, no, not enough. Not yet. In recent years, likely as a part of my overall campaign to improve my health, I have noticed that my claustrophobia has abated somewhat, making the idea of being in the midst of a large gathering of the general public much less daunting. And yet as I headed downtown for my annual visit to the Village Halloween Parade, I found a bit of the old anxiety creeping in around the edges. There are a number of things I’ve been concerned about lately, so I wouldn’t chalk it all up to politics, but this upcoming monumental event can certainly lay claim to a large percentage. True, most signs point to a happy outcome, but the fact that it may turn out to be another close one is truly sickmaking, not only because of the thought of four more years of the same malfeasance and backward thinking (possibly amplified), but because of what its says about a certain faction of those with whom I share a nationality, if not a national identity. Top it off with the fact that even a landslide Obama victory would only be a foot to the decelerator in the regressive, anti-humanist, anti-intellectual skid this country has been in for decades-

 

We may have actually hit enough a little while back, so let’s just say that sometimes it looks as if the Boys from Akron were even more right than they knew and move on.

 

With Halloween falling on a Friday this year, the ratio of costumes throughout the borough was likely to be much higher, but for a little while after leaving home to head downtown, I saw only one foursome dressed, fairly nondescriptly, the men in frightwigs and multi-colored clothes, one woman’s outfit concealed by a coat and the other in a dirty Raggedy Anne/Strawberry Shortcake number, which included one of those miniskirts that doesn’t appear to have a hope in hell of not sliding up like a steel window in a stroke booth and yet somehow stays in place, but that was about it. Happily, a young Asian couple sitting together in full-body mouse suits on the corner of 42nd turned out to be heralds of what was to come and as soon as I came in proximity of them I saw plenty of costumes walking in both directions on that avenue-street.

 

Of course, the throngs didn’t kick in until Madison Square, as usual, and past 23rd Street the sidewalks were swimming in people. Allowing yourself to be carried along with the flow, this is when the costume-watching begins in earnest, along with a little side game as you try to guess which people sort of look like they’re dressed up but really aren’t. This is a byproduct of Village culture where some people dress in unusual clothing all year long. (Hell, some people dress as if it’s Halloween all year long.)

 

I had thought I would try to find the same diner the window ledge of which I had stood on the previous year and which had proved to be a decent vantage point from which to watch the proceedings, but somehow I had gotten it into my head that it had been on 10th Street and it wasn’t until I actually got to the parade route at 10th and Sixth Avenue that I realized my mistake. (The revelation was actually pleasing in a way. The previous year I had seen numerous signs of parties and festivities for the local kids along the block between Fifth and Sixth Avenues, which didn’t seem to be as strongly in evidence this year. Hopefully the wrongly chosen street meant that the same level of enthusiasm was again taking place only a block away.)

 

There was a window ledge outside of a health food store on this corner as well, but it was much more low to the ground and subsequently not nearly as effective as the previous year’s, and so, finding an opening in the steady flow of revelers moving onto the avenue from the street (and vice versa), I moved a bit closer to the festivities. As a result, I ended up doing quite a bit of one of the last things I generally expect when going down to the parade, which is…watching the actual parade.

 

One thing I expected to see and didn’t are the standard large puppets of looming skeletons and the like. There were some smaller ones, but the really big ones either didn’t make an appearance or I missed them. One of the things I didn’t expect to see too much of were sponsored floats, given the reports of sponsors pulling out in the wake of the financial crisis, so it was funny that one of the first things I did see was the Jagermeister truck. Girls dressed in dayglo outfits with matching wigs and guys dressed as the deer of the JM logo – along with one guy dressed as a JM bottle – all danced enthusiastically to an upbeat pop song, in German no less, about the patron beverage, bouncing so boisterously during the chorus, I wondered if the vehicle’s shocks could stand it, and I don’t even really know what that means. The crowd certainly enjoyed it, and it made me wonder about my friend Jason and what he might be up to. He had once had to have his stomach pumped after x-amount too many shots of that pungent liqueur.

 

Of course, politics did put in an appearance (although surprisingly I didn’t see one Sarah Palin costume), most visibly when a large Obama contingent went by in the parade, sporting a cutout of the big O himself. Deep down I cringed at the thought that someone might fling something at the avatar, with all of the horrifying symbolism that could embody, but all that happened was a group of young women just to the north of me began chanting his name. More amusing, if juvenile, was a wag who passed by with a Dubya mask, a toilet seat around his neck, and a sign saying ‘Sewage W. Bush, Ready to Be Flushed, January 20th 2009.’ Not the way I would choose to express myself, but, hey, it’s funny because it’s true.

 

More musical floats went by, including the Kostume Kult, a densely packed trailer of people who appeared to have stepped directly out of NYC’s early-‘90s rave culture. These are a good example of the kind of people who dress as if it’s Halloween all year long. The float’s MC, perched up front in a pseudo-superhero kind of get-up, microphone in hand, really got the crowd going with his patter. I’ve never been interested in the city’s club culture, but in that moment I appreciated its enthusiasm more than I would have thought possible.

 

It was also about this time that I looked around and realized that I had allowed myself to wander into the middle of a fair-sized group of people. Not only that, but I felt completely comfortable. Funny that I had begun the evening worrying about old fears returning and now I had apparently sloughed them off without even thinking about it.

 

This also turned out to be a good spot for two of my favorite sights of the evening, one large, the other far subtler. Across the avenue is the Jefferson Market building, an ecclesiastical looking structure that served as a courthouse for female prisoners until sometime in the ‘30s when it was converted into the library branch it functions as to this day. A small group of people were standing on a balcony in one of the building’s parapets and were dangling a large white spider puppet down the side that danced constantly the entire time I was there. On a smaller note, at one point I looked towards the very front of the crowd and saw a person filming the passersby with a camera held over their head with both hands. The funny part was that one hand was clutching a hunting knife – presumably a part of a costume – the blade sticking out to the side as if it were just another attachment for the camera.

 

I was actually paying so much attention to the parade that I hadn’t done nearly as much costume watching as usual, but I did manage to jot down notes of some of those that struck a chord. There seemed to be a surprisingly high number of pirates, Egyptians and French aristocrats this year. There was a Futurama crew amongst the marchers (actually, I can only confirm a Leela and a Zoidberg). There was a small troupe of bumblebees (also, like the mice earlier, all Asian, a propos of nothing except perhaps a consistency on the part of the evening’s representation of the animal kingdom), a pretty good homemade Power Ranger, a really good homemade Pinhead, and a woman who had single-serving cereal boxes stuck all over her torso with bloody plastic knives. One of the funniest was a guy dressed up as the late Bob “Happy Little Trees” Ross, made all the funnier by how many people probably thought he was just some random guy in a curly wig with a palette.

 

Now, you’ll notice that I’m not saying much about the controversial yet all-important slut factor. This is not because there wasn’t plenty of skin on display, but more because a) as already stated I spent far more time than usual watching the parade and b) this being Friday, I knew there would probably be plenty of costumed lovelies buzzing around outside the bars to ogle discreetly on the way back uptown. In fact, there came a point when I realized that if I was to make it to the place I needed to be by 10 o’clock, I had to pull myself away and start trekking back up. Now, somehow my mind, despite having all the requisite pieces handy, had failed to put the puzzle together. I had left the parade in plenty of time to reach my destination, if, that is, the holiday crowd had thinned out beyond the Village as it would normally have done. But while I had anticipated lots of Friday night revelers in costume, I had somehow failed to take into consideration how much of an obstacle these extra people on the street would be to my progress. By the time I was halfway there, I realized time was fleeting and it was too late to jump on the subway as well. Subsequently many blocks were covered at a run and the costumed lovelies (and, yes, they were in abundance) ended up being largely a blur, a glimpse of stocking here, a flash of cleavage there, painted lips, giant lashes, the odd garter strap and skirt hem. Between my frantic pace, my serpentine moves and my eyes’ insistence on girl-watching at peril to the rest of my body, it’s really a small miracle that I didn’t go ass-over-teakettle at any point. But I didn’t, and what’s more I made it to my destination only a few minutes late. A part of me wished I had been able to stay longer at the parade, and yet the bittersweetness made me appreciate it all the more. Next year hopefully my plans will be more solid.

 

And so I toss into the stew of the internet this rambling post about what is supposed to be the scariest day of the year on what could be, midnight having passed, the actual scariest day of the year, or at least the most nerve-wracking. As of this moment, I don’t know what is going to happen to the country, but I’m not even going to focus on that right now. Better to plan revamped efforts to make friends with someone who lives on the parade route. Or someone who knows someone who lives on the parade route. Or someone who knows someone who knows someone who lives on the parade route. But not someone who knows someone who knows someone who knows someone who lives on the parade route, because, you know, that would just be crashing.

 

Primo Vantage Point in ’09!

 

Until next year…

Love in the Used Bin

  • May. 31st, 2008 at 2:37 AM


Man, sometimes you just get lucky.

I had planned to go down to Generation Records, but then didn't sleep well the night before, so I thought I'd put it off. Then, on second thought, I figured it was nice out and I could go to the Union Square Market while I was at it, so I hauled myself down there.

Then I decided to forego going downstairs to the used section in the basement since their punk/hardcore section usually only has new bands I've never heard of instead of the classic stuff I prefer. But while I'm going through the new racks on the ground floor, I can hear some "punk" guy talking up the "punk" girl working behind the counter, lame talk about his band that she's lapping up, all prelude, no doubt, to some "punk" sex. I don't really have a problem with any of this, aside from vague annoyance at being so aware of the flirtations of others, until she comes out from behind the counter and they start flipping through the Poison Idea CDs, and saying , ew, they're so disgusting, such fat pigs, etc. Never mind that they're one of the all-time greats. Anyway, I couldn't listen to any more of that shit, so I retreated to the basement not expecting much, and, lo and behold, not too long after diving in, a used copy of Sounds of Nature by Christ on Parade surfaces. An album I've been dying to hear by the band that recorded one of my top five favorites.



So, thank you, lame faux-punks. Your annoying flirtation brought us together.

Also purchased in the same visit:

Survival of the Fattest- No, not a new Poison Idea album, but a compilation of bands from NOFX's Fat Wreck Chords label.

Old Tyme Lemonade- A compilation of punk/hardcore bands from Rhode Island, specifically Providence and Olneyville. Who knew RI had such a vibrant scene? I know that Providence is (or used to be, I don't know its current status) home to The Living Room, one of New England's coolest clubs, but I didn't realize that it had produced so many underground bands itself. (Having now listened to some of it, it appears to be predominantly geared towards lo-fi experimental noise. Somehow that makes a bit more sense.)

The Freak Accident- Purchased solely for the fact that a) it was a buck, and b) it was released by Alternative Tentacles, this actually turned out to be a side project by Ralph Spight, guitarist/vocalist for the great-yet-underrated Victim's Family. Like I said, sometimes you just get lucky.

SNIVLEM!!!

  • May. 9th, 2008 at 3:22 AM


Quite a few months ago, I signed up for a music meme that was making the rounds, and was assigned by Lady Juniper (a.k.a. [info]ruby_stevens) to list my ten favorite songs by The Melvins. After volunteering for this, it occurred to me that I HATE WRITING ABOUT MUSIC. But never let it be said that I didn't turn in an assignment ludicrously after the fact, and so, as promised (to myself if no one else), here it is, lengthy intro included:




The Melvins (left to right: Mark Deutrom, King Buzzo, Dale Crover)

I like to tell people who are unfamiliar with The Melvins that they’re a punk band that plays metal. A bit simplistic, but not inaccurate. They rose within the Washington State punk scene, and were hugely influential on the bands from that same scene that came to represent the grunge movement (like it or not, grunge is an outgrowth of punk), although The Melvins were ten times as eccentric as their more famous descendents. And while the connection between punk and ‘70s hard rock was not a new thing (perhaps best exemplified by The Minutemen’s frequent invocation of Blue Öyster Cult), no one wore their love of it on their sleeves like The Melvins did, gleefully referencing Kiss songs and crafting Sabbath-like riffs, only to use them to create distinctly un-metallic one to two minute long songs. Eventually the tracks became longer (all the better to accommodate the glacially-paced tempos the band loves so much) and they began to branch out into more flagrantly pot-inspired experimentalism, such as ‘Lividity,’ the nine-minute narco-nod bliss that closes the Stoner Witch album, but the retro hard rock flavoring remained consistent. (Incidentally, if the boys aren’t soft drug fans – and there’s evidence in both directions – they do a remarkable impression.)
 
The Melvins’ output over the years has been truly impressive, unquestionably so in regards to bulk, more debatable when it comes to quality, particularly in light of their seeming willingness to record just about anything they write. I’ve also come to the conclusion that one of the reasons they rub some people the wrong way is that they often work contrary to peoples’ musical reflexes, as in, “That note doesn’t go there,” and, “You shouldn’t be hitting that beat, should you?” Math metal bands do that as well, but somewhat more overtly, whereas The Melvins often appear to be offering the familiar, which makes it that much more disconcerting when they veer off course. Regardless of whether there’s any actual smoke involved, there is a stoner aesthetic at work here, but to dismiss it as only that is to do a disservice to the band’s relentless individualism and significant talent. Diehard Melvins fans so taken with their frequently audacious brilliance are simply prone to forgive their more self-indulgent moments (or at least blaze up and play along.)
 
The core of the band are guitarist/vocalist Buzz “King Buzzo” Osborne and drummer Dale Crover (supplemented by an interesting stream of bass players; individuals indicated after each song title; I think Joe Preston is the only regular bassist not featured, but that’s just because I don’t own any of the records he played on), and while Buzzo’s eccentric compositions give them their character, it must be said that Crover’s drumming is a large part of why it works. There are times when one is tempted to think that Buzzo really is just making it up as he goes along, only Dale manages to be right there with him at every oddball step, which means that these two either have some kind of telepathic thing going on or they have indeed spent hours upon hours nailing these songs until they could play them backwards, and sometimes it’s hard to be sure that they’re not.
 
There are still a fair number of albums I don’t own, but I own enough to make choosing just ten songs a bit difficult. I knew it would be just as hard to choose only a few from the magnificent Stoner Witch as it would be easy to resist including a track from the purely-for-novelty-value Prick (which, having been rejected by Atlantic, had to be released on Amphetamine/Reptile with the band name listed as Snivlem; I do plan to write about Prick one of these days because it really is quite…unusual).
 
And so, in chronological order, ten (give or take) favorites:
 
  1. ‘Eye Flys’ (bassist: Matt Lukin, also of Mudhoney) – I remember seeing ads for The Melvins’ first LP, Gluey Porch Treatments, in Maximum Rock’n’Roll while I was still in high school, but it was many years before I actually heard it, and, in the interim, the Seattle scene in which they cut their teeth had both exploded and faded away. I don’t know that I would have thought much of the album if I had heard it when it was released, as I was a bit of a hardcore snob back then, which leads me to wonder what reaction it garnered in the scenes outside of their immediate thrall. Though predominantly made up of their unique brand of short, heavy composition, their experience on the hardcore scene does show its face a bit more than it would on later releases. But it is amusing to contemplate what most punks must have thought of the album’s opening track, an unapologetic lumbering paean to the band’s beloved Black Sabbath that begins with a four-and-a-quarter-minute long intro that is itself longer than every other full track on the album, barring the instrumental finale, ‘Over from Under the Excrement.’ There might actually be better songs on the album, but the way the boys open things up by giving their all in such a tortured manner, well, you have to respect that, even if you breathe a small sigh of relief when the headbanging ‘Echo Head’ kicks in a moment later.
 
  1. ‘Let God Be Your Gardener’/‘Koollegged’/‘Dead Dressed’ (bassist: Lori ‘Lorax’ Black, daughter of Shirley Temple Black, yes, she of both the UN and the Good Ship Lollipop) – Trying to write about individual songs from The Melvins’ early catalog is like trying to review individual pieces of dim sum. They’re plenty interesting but how much can you say about something that’s gone in one bite? I don’t know if I could choose a definite favorite from these particular standout songs from the Ozma album, but each exemplifies in its own way the unique style that characterizes these early compositions and may help explain why some people find the band so frustrating. ‘Gardener’ gives us an intro made up of a few different rocking riffs one would expect to be repeated throughout a longer song, but which quickly fold in on themselves. ‘Kool’ gives us both a build-up to and a wind-down from a main song body that never actually makes an appearance. And ‘Dressed’ serves up one of the album’s best riffs, but when it builds up to that riff a second time, all we get is a little teaser and the song ends. And yet, again like dim sum, the pleasure may be brief, but it is intense.
 
  1. ‘Your Blessened’ (bassist: Black) – The follow-up to Ozma, Bullhead, is roughly the same duration but with half the songs. Ironically, while the greater song length would have allowed them to really put their wacko riffs to work, they instead opted for a more subdued approach, and the result is several tracks that have an unfortunate sameness to them, although a song such as ‘Zodiac’ shows their ability to spin solid rock out of very simple material (as does, to a lesser degree, ‘Boris,’ a song fan-popular enough to have inspired another band to name itself after it, though it’s not a personal favorite). The penultimate track, ‘Your Blessened’ isn’t much more complex than most of the rest of the songs, and yet something about it stands out. I guess it’s mostly the extended bridge in which Buzzo wails on the guitar a bit, only to pull back and let the bass and drums carry on quietly and ominously, coming back in with eerie echoed vocals before letting loose with the guitar again back into the main theme. It not only makes the song seem a bit longer and more epic than it actually is, it gives a sense that is largely absent from many of their earlier compositions: that of having arrived somewhere.
 
  1. ‘Honey Bucket’ (bassist: Black, though some reports indicate she didn’t actually play much on this album owing to drug problems) – Say what you want about Kurt Cobain (fjord knows, many have), but he was genuinely interested in sharing his success with the bands that inspired him. Hence, you have the Meat Puppets joining him for the MTV Unplugged session to perform some of their early songs and getting some widespread exposure in the process. Granted they didn’t stay on the radar for long, but, then, their kind of independently-minded music isn’t suited to the corporate business anyway, and that goes quadruple for The Melvins. Houdini was the first album in a short-lived relationship with Atlantic, and the difference does kind of show. There are a couple of tracks near the end that could be viewed as pandering to the expectations of the Nirvana fans who likely bought it, even if only for Cobain’s presence (he produced and plays on a few tracks, though Buzzo swears his input was minimal). But even those are pretty good songs, and they certainly don’t detract from the album’s strongest material, which includes this marked departure from the sludge formula. Divided into two equally badass segments, a fierce intro and a driving main body during which Buzzo seems to be channeling the voice of James Hetfield, and which is over far too quickly (a throwback to their teasing early days perhaps), this is a short, sweet fun park ride of a track.
 
  1. ‘Revolve’ (bassist: Mark Deutrom, who also produced a number of their albums before joining) – Not, heaven forfend, to suggest that a corporate deal could possibly result in a band/artist producing some of their finest work, but Stoner Witch, the last album the Melvins did for Atlantic before shrugging and heading back to indie-ville (the title of which purportedly references Courtney Love, which, if it’s true, may be one of the most unintentionally corporate things they ever did), is some of their finest work. Ironically, while they maintain their love of the unusual (and occasionally the masturbatory), it also represents some of their most accessible as well, with such fine tracks as ‘Queen,’ the evocative instrumental ‘Junebug,’ and this kicker. Aside from the 6/4 opening, a machine-like riff appropriate to the song’s title, this is one of the most straightforward rockers they’ve ever done, one might almost say traditional, right down to the walking riff that tops off the chorus and the tube amp-style guitar solo that floats in from the background. They’ve never shied away from their retro-love, and yet they’ve also never sounded quite as unabashedly comfortable with it as they do here. And it’s an extra-added joy to hear Dale riding the toms like an expert logroller.
 
  1. ‘Roadbull’ (bassist: Deutrom) – Another gem from Witch, this is one of the most perfect simultaneous examples of the Melvins’ craft and eccentricity in one neat little package. A tight stop-start opener gives way to a contemplative bass motif. Now, you would normally expect this to lead into something else, but, as with the sleight of hand they exhibited in those earlier releases, what a surprise when the motif turns out to be the main meat of the song. After a brief plunge into something harder, the bass line comes back, eventually accompanied by Crover’s military beat and a chorus of whistling, conjuring up images of a marching battalion, which may or may not have anything to do with the lyrics. (You may have noticed that I don’t mention the lyrics much. That’s because they tend towards the abstract, with word constructs and even words that seem to have bled over from some alternate consciousness. I’m not saying that they don’t mean anything; just that meaning remains pretty elusive.) As each part does its thing and drops out, leaving Dale’s beat to close the door behind them, you may think that the ending is drawn out, but I personally don’t think it could have been done any other way.
 
  1. ‘At the Stake’ (bassist: Deutrom) – One of their most purely Sabbath-like songs, certainly in spirit at any rate, this molasses-paced outing continually confounds the listener with its unusual emphases. (My brother played it for his guitar teacher, and they concluded the time signature to be 10/8 or something, but I think it’s plain old 4/4. You just need to ignore where the notes fall to count it right.) I tend to think of this as another natural evolution from their earlier stuff, this time from the likes of ‘Eye Flys.’ While that earlier track was played in such a way as to make each chord played feel like a hammer to the head of a nail, here they’ve packed just as much energy into what they’re playing but they’ve learned how to extend it and…slow release it, if you will, so that the energy flows out in thrumming streams, only finding full release with the floodgate opening of the chorus, and even then one gets a sense of a powerful hand at work, controlling the wave of sound so that it doesn’t come completely crashing down upon us. (Man, when I start to sound like a real rock critic, you know a floodgate of a different sort has been opened.) Actually, I kind of like the magical hand image as it speaks to the lyrics of the song, which are ever so slightly less obtuse than their usual fare, meaning that the basic theme is apparent. Witchy as the vibe of the rest of the song is, perhaps no moment works as well as the lead-in from the verse to the chorus, nothing but pounding drum and Buzzo inhaling asthmatically up to a moment of silence you can easily imagine being that brief second before they touch the match to the kindling.
 
  1. 'Mary Lady Bobby Kins' (bassist: Kevin Rutmanis, also of The Cows and Patton project Tomahawk) – Safely back in the arms of the underground, the boys landed at frequent collaborator and hardest-working-man-in-hard-rock Mike Patton’s Ipecac label, where they released a trilogy of albums, The Crybaby, The Bootlicker and The Maggot. I’ve only ever heard the middle album, Bootlicker, so I can’t tell you what, if any, the connection between the three is. (Although Bootlicker does end with what sounds like a backstage recording of a band on stage playing Nirvana’s ‘Smells Like Teen Spirit,’ and one of the other albums includes a straight-up cover of that song. Make of that what you will.) I remain curious as to whether the other two are as atypical as Bootlicker, which is almost uniformly mellow. It’s always interesting to hear them reveal their softer side (and occasionally sublime, as in Witch’s ‘Shevil’); they tend to proceed in a kind of whisper mode, as if afraid that any moment they might bust out in a chord as big and unwieldy as a tank. This particular song drifts along on a spacey melody before changing course into a more upbeat riff, bouncy and yet really no less hushed. It fits in well with the rest of the album, pretty much all of which sounds like it could have been written and recorded in impromptu fashion over a lazy weekend.
 
  1. ‘III/The Bloated Pope’ (bassist: Rutmanis) – These are the dual opening tracks from their collaboration with sound collagist Lustmord (né Brian Williams), Pigs of the Roman Empire. The album as a whole sort of comes off as ambient music for stoner rockers, and, as such, it gets a bit repetitive at times, but it is interesting nonetheless. The title track is particularly chilling (and evocative; perhaps I’m easily suggestible but much of it does make me think of scheming men in togas skulking through huge column-lined passageways). And these opening tracks get the ball rolling by dishing up two very disparate types of menace. ‘III’ is an extended build-up of sounds: steadily increasing drones are punctuated by clanging bells and what sounds like huge doors (more visions of the antiquity referred to in the album title), along with weird insect-like gibbering. The horror movie ambience slowly corners the listener until the band bursts out into ‘Pope,’ a gloriously grinding hard rock riff driven by Crover’s typically inspired pounding and Buzzo’s guitar, which appropriately buzzes, as does his voice, except in the mellow interlude when he mewls like a deranged kitten. Most of the rest of the album plays in a sort of stream of consciousness mode, but even if none of that appeals to you, the solid punch of the opening alone makes it worth a listen.
 
  1. ‘Caped Crusader’ (bassist: Rutmanis) – On their first collaboration with hardcore icon Jello Biafra, Don’t Breathe What You Can’t See, the boys do a remarkable job of emulating Plastic Surgery Disasters-era DKs. (And given the sad affair of the remaining Kennedys suing Jello over supposed revenue loss, thus forcing a capitalistic end onto one of the most stridently anti-commercial bands ever, this is almost certainly the closest thing we will ever get to a new DKs album.) Buzzo’s siren-like twanging in the anachronistically upbeat ‘Islamic Bomb’ sounds so much like East Bay Ray’s stylings, it can only be considered a direct reference, and the same can be said of the bass and drums in certain points in regard to Klaus Flouride and D. H. Peligro. Only the last song on the album, ‘Rise of the Locusts,’ really sounds like a Melvins song, with some offbeat time signatures and the album’s one venture into sludge territory. Interestingly, ‘Caped Crusader,’ arguably the best track on the album, doesn’t really sound like either band. Borrowing actual words from both Mohammad Atta and John Ashcroft (whom he credits as co-authors) Jello calls a fundamentalist a fundamentalist to an initial riff that’s almost Clutch-like before veering off into a driving middle section, concluding with a final section that brings the fear back home, in more ways than one. Stirring and scary.
TA-DAAAAAA!

Whoops. Almost forgot. If you're reading this and want to join in, although I would imagine this meme has long since run its course, list four or five artists you dig, and I'll choose one for you to list your ten favorite tracks.

And Now a Word from Our Monsters...

  • Apr. 9th, 2008 at 6:55 PM

I've done political posts here before, though usually more of the philosophical variety, and I don't intend to turn this into a branch office of YouTube, but I do think I and all liberal-minded (not to mention morally-minded) people need to take every chance possible to remind people of why a McCain presidency would be, shall we say, less than ideal. And so, for the small group who are likely s see this, I pass on the latest Move-On ad:



 

'Goddess Sweat'

  • Mar. 2nd, 2008 at 2:14 AM

 
New York Aberrant, September 3, 2007
 
NEWTON T. BEARWHISTLE
 
Bryan Fisher stood at the end of the bar in his Upper East Side tavern, The Pigeon Hole. This was a special, and somewhat poignant evening. Along the bend of the bar sat three of his oldest regulars in their designated seats, Clark, Herbie and Pops. Each man held a small glass of beer with which they were preparing to make a toast, as did the remainder of the small group gathered. Most toasts touched with melancholia are for those who have gone away, leaving either the city, the country, or the corporeal plane. But these glasses were being raised for something else that would soon be going away. The beer in those very glasses.
            If your tear ducts fail to produce any moisture at that little revelation, the men wouldn’t blame you. Fisher elaborated in an interview at which Clark and Herbie were also present, conducted before the night in question. “This is an emotional thing for us, but I wouldn’t expect anyone else to completely understand,” said the tall, lanky proprietor, running his hand along the length of his full ponytail, his slight accent betraying his UK origins. “I don’t completely understand it either. And that mystery is part of it. We seem to have been privy to something very few other people have had the pleasure of experiencing, if any.”
            The story starts seven years earlier not long after Fisher had taken over as owner of the Pigeon, after a long stint tending its bar. One day a delivery arrived with an unexpected bonus: ten cases of a beer called Bojinyapot, something that hadn’t been ordered and nothing of which anyone present had ever heard. On a whim, Fisher accepted the anomalous delivery…and a new cult was born.
            “I swear,” explained Clark, a well-dressed, slender man with glasses that give him a professorial air, “I had never tasted a beer that…I want to use the word ‘succulent,’ though generally that’s something you say about meat, but, in a way, drinking this beer was almost like taking a good mouthful of the most tender meat. Sometimes. The next sip might be like the most delicious hot fudge sundae you ever had.”
            Herbie, whose baseball cap and armchair umpire physique make him a fitting contrast with Clark, piped in. “But it isn’t that it actually tasted like those things. It’s that drinking it, you wouldn’t just get refreshed; you’d also find yourself experiencing sensations that were completely loopy. One day I took a swig and suddenly found myself remembering the taste of the cherry lipstick this girl I used to date always wore.”
            Fisher held off on putting the beer on the pub’s list, preferring to have a select group of the regulars sample it first. All of them said the same thing. It was unlike anything they had ever tasted, indeed, unlike anything they had ever experienced. While he still hadn’t made up his mind about offering it to the general public, it was unanimously decided that a case should be kept around for odd-hour and after-hour consumption. Fisher called his distributor to make it a part of the standing order. Which is where things started to get really weird.
            “I call up my man, tell him I want to add this to the regular delivery. He doesn’t know what the hell I’m talking about. Never heard of the stuff. He looks over our previous requisition. No record of it. I go check my copy of the receipt. Nothing.
            “So I get on the internet. Do a little research. Nothing.
            “The label on the bottle was quite non-descript. Just the name in simple type and bare bones information you'd find on any product, so that was no help. We had thought at first that the name might be Indian or somewhere in that part of the world, but that didn’t pan out. Then somebody suggested Russian, so I go to this guy Oleg who comes in here from time to time and take him into my confidence, ask him if he’s ever heard of the stuff.” Fisher shook his head. “Nothing.”
            Oleg not only hadn’t heard of the brand, he informed them that he couldn’t quite make out the language. It did seem Slavic in origin, but it wasn’t one with which he was immediately familiar. He was able to tell them that the name roughly approximated what in his language would have meant ‘Goddess Sweat.’ Fisher laughed at the memory. “I have to say, when he told me that, I got little chill. I mean, considering the slightly unusual nature of the feeling that drinking it produced.”
            And the unusual did not stop there, next manifesting itself in what might be chalked up to fuzzy math if it weren’t for Fisher’s reputation for keeping impeccable books. Since they couldn’t be sure that they would ever be able to get their hands on any more of the brew, they rationed it very strictly, only allowing themselves so much at a time, and sticking to the specific appointed drinking times. And though technically it all belonged to Fisher, in the interest of fairness he restricted himself to the same amount as everyone else. Having calculated, he believed he knew exactly how long their supply would last. And then one day, during inventory, Fisher noticed that there was more than there should have been. Indeed as time went on, while the cache was getting noticeably smaller, it seemed to replenish itself a little bit. Like those legendary loaves and fishes, it was stretching far beyond any reasonable expectation.
            Still, all good things apparently do have to come to an end, and that day had arrived. The chosen few had assembled to down the last of what they all swore they would happily drink for the rest of their lives if they only knew how to get their hands on more of it. They had decided ahead of time that, in honor of the occasion, they should allow themselves more than the usual ration, and had planned the day specifically so that they’d have enough to indulge.
Fisher was kind enough to invite me to take part, first making sure that I was a true beer drinker, of course. (Would you give away your last smear of wild mushroom paté to someone who would prefer to be eating pork rinds?) After pondering the whole ‘better to have loved and lost’ quandary for a little while, I decided that if this quaff was anything like they described it, I would be a fool to pass it up, even if I was forever after haunted by the memory.
The fateful night came and the portions were passed out to all gathered. After accepting mine, I drifted along the bar doing my observer/reporter schtick, eventually settling at the edge of the small crowd. I was apparently being conspicuously conservative with my glass, because before long I heard Clark and Herbie calling to me from the corner where they sat between Fisher at the end and Pops to their right.
“You can’t drink it all in sips, you know!” yelled Clark.
“Yeah!” agreed Herbie. “You have to take at least one good swig!”
Raising my glass in acknowledgement, I poured a healthy amount into my mouth, letting my tongue float in it for a few seconds before swallowing it in a gulp.
The rich flavor, which I had already experienced in the previous sips, was very much in evidence. You don’t generally expect anything beyond that except an aftertaste, but more there was. Suddenly the bar faded to a lower perception. It was still there but like a picture within a picture on a TV set. The rest of my consciousness was suddenly back in the high school photo lab, on my knees, Kate Dempsey’s fingers in my hair as her slightly clammy thighs pressed against my ears. So vivid was the memory that I hesitate to even classify it as such. Closer to what I’ve been told a lucid dream is like.
And then, the bar came soaring back to the forefront, triggered by a dark-skinned hand landing on my shoulder. It was Pops, the senior regular di tutti regulari. He clasped my shoulder and laughed. “That did something for you, didn’t it? Heh heh. Little magic carpet ride, eh? Heh heh.”
I smiled and muttered something in assent, but the drink wasn’t quite done with me yet. Another strange sensation came over me, this one not altogether pleasant. Like Fred C. Dobbs, whose last vestiges of humanity were eroded by his proximity to that beautiful gold (only much, much less intense than that), I found an odd thought creeping into my mind. As I looked across the crowd at Bryan Fisher, smiling beneficently over his diehard patrons, I couldn’t help but wonder if he had maybe stashed away a bit of the wonderful brew for his own use. Perhaps held back one cardboard case of six, in hopes that every time he went to look at it, there would be one more bottle left, followed by replacement after replacement until the magic was down to nothing but fumes, followed by nothing but…nothing.
And once again, I was pulled back to the here and now by Pops’ hand, which had never left my shoulder. This time it squeezed with a strength that demanded I look right at him. “Heh heh. I see the way you’re looking at Bryan. And I know what you’re thinking. Heh heh.” He leaned in. “Now, of course, I myself would never wonder about such a thing.” And he laughed his little laugh again, never once taking his deep, rheumy eyes off of mine.
Now, many of you may have reached for the phone book to look up the address of the Pigeon Hole, only to hesitate, figuring the names must have been changed. After all, a story such as this one, touched as it is by mysticism and booze, is bound to attract all sorts of nutballs. (Who likely read about it in a copy they found discarded on the subway, considering what fine, paragons of mental health subscribe to the Aberrant, right, Newt?- Ed.) But, indeed, the pub and all people involved are represented by their real names. (Well, everyone but Kate Dempsey. I’m not a cad, you know.) I offered to give them journalistic mask, but Fisher declined, saying he was willing to take the influx of business over the potential headache of unbalanced curiosity- seeker. So, by all means, seek the place out with enthusiasm and upon arrival you will be greeted with same.
And as to those who may entertain suspicions such as I did regarding any leftovers, I would advise that you follow Pops’ plan: better not to wonder about such a thing. -NTB


Note: The Aberrant is, for the nonce, a fictional newspaper. No such publication exists. Yet.

 
I was reading a newspaper story this past week about the latest clash in Kenya between police and people protesting the recent election, and one man, a teacher, was quoted as saying, “We will go the extra mile for democracy. We are ready for bloodshed.” I have to admit his words made me cringe.
 
It’s not that I don’t understand – history has proven on numerous occasions that sometimes the only way to maintain a free society is to inflict violence on those who would take away that freedom – or even that I disapprove, which would be futile anyway. But to deny to myself that it feels wrong all the same, that it feels as if in human existence such confluence of our best and worst instincts shouldn’t even be organically possible, would be equally futile. And, in a time of quick trigger diplomacy, in a time when the “leader of the free world” grins and giggles and calls himself a “wartime president” with pride, as if war didn’t represent the ultimate in human failure (and even the best, most justified wars still do just that), it would be irresponsible as well. I can accept the need for a military, but I don’t have to like it. I can be grateful that there are men and women who are willing to put themselves in harm’s way for the good of others, but I will not pretend that their need to do so is a good thing. (And, tangentially, I will not thank them for being in Iraq to “protect my freedom,” because they’re not; it’s plausible, if arguable, that they’re there to protect the Iraqis freedom, or at least think they are, but that has nothing to do with me.)

It is times like this when I become acutely aware of how ineffectual philosophy can be and yet how essential it actually is. The truth is that those with the most guns will most often get their way. But we must never forget that their manufactured strength is gained at a sacrifice to their humanity. They may not believe it, they may not care, but we have to. We may accept that sometimes the noble man must resort to violence, but we must maintain that his choice is a sacrifice as well, a final option and not in anyway a fun one. We must acknowledge the baser instincts of man while not succumbing to the lazy assertion that they define him, and we must not allow those who would define us by their own baseness have the last word. We must speak and we must keep on speaking, and we must hope that should that day ever come when we fall to their animal brutality that our words live on after us.
 
Happy Martin Luther King Day.

The Waking Dream

  • Dec. 24th, 2007 at 7:45 PM


December 2001. I walk out of a screening of David Lynch’s Mulholland Dr., blown away. It will be six years before I set foot in a movie theater again.
 
That’s a little misleading. Mulholland Dr. is one hell of a film, but it didn’t ruin me for all other movies. The truth was I had already found myself increasingly disenchanted with movie-going by that point, and the sentiment blossomed thereafter. I simply don’t feel the communal experience the way other people evidently do. Add to that the cost, inconvenience, my general restlessness, even when it comes to movies I like, and the inability to press Pause should I so wish, and my desire to go to the movies simply evaporated. When Inland Empire, Lynch’s follow-up to Mulholland Dr., came out, and I allowed its admittedly limited run to come and go, I figured that was it. If Davey L. couldn’t get my ass in a seat, what the hell chance did any other filmmaker stand?
 
This could almost be looked upon as an affliction – aside from the financial aspect, which really is a bitch; $11 at last count – given that I live in a major metropolitan area that must get somewhere in the 90 percentile of this nation’s releases and is home to revivals from every corner of the cinematic imagination every week. Clearly I just didn’t want it.
 
Then a couple of things happened that kind of changed things, one fairly recently and the other over a period of time. The former was a small film festival to which I was marginally connected. I got to see two clusters of short films, and it had been so long since I had experienced the whole ‘flickers in the dark’ phenomenon, the slight return was enjoyable, and I thought I might want to do it again soon. The second, far more inspirational factor was my ongoing art study. To my considerable fortune, there has been a surfeit of amazing exhibits over the past few years, including quite a few related to my primary study, German/Austrian Expressionism, and, having gotten into the habit of going to galleries on a regular basis, I became all too acutely aware of what a tremendous difference it makes to see a painting in the flesh, so to speak, as opposed to a reproduction. This awareness brought to mind the idea that film – any art form really – should be seen in as close an approximation to the conditions that the artist intended as possible, in this case on the big screen, a tenet I had once preached, somewhat hypocritically so as my own habits moved more towards video with maybe one theater visit a year.
 
So when I discovered that the IFC Center in the West Village would be showing a limited run of Lynch’s debut feature, Eraserhead, in a print re-mastered for the film’s thirtieth anniversary, I knew immediately that I had to go, indeed, that I would be pissed off at myself if I didn’t. We’re talking about a movie that is both one of the quintessential cult films and one of the quintessential art films, not to mention one that for a long time could only be seen on battered, out-of-print tape copies from its initial VHS release, and the occasional bootleg print. (Lynch once commented, humorously, though I don’t doubt that he was serious, that the only legal print of the film was under his bed.)
 
A few nights before I was due to go, I dreamed that a long-delayed follow-up TV movie to Lynch’s series Twin Peaks was being broadcast, something that, sadly, will likely only ever happen in the subconscious of the show’s fans. The appropriateness of this however is just too good, given that the film I was going to see is a portrait of a subconscious mind spilled, across a plate, all over the floor, and through all manner of suggestive openings.
 
Eraserhead does have a plot, although it’s hardly the primary driving force behind the film. We follow permanently befuddled Henry Spencer (the late, sad-eyed Jack Nance), a man who lives in a dreary world of industry, where the sound of huge machines chugging somewhere nearby not only sets the landscape’s ominous tone but also serves the same function as music would in certain moments (the sound design alone, by Lynch and frequent collaborator Alan Splet, should be considered a major accomplishment by a novice filmmaker), and where life is ever-intruded upon, whether it be by pipes that snake through the room, hissing bursts of steam, or lamps that buzz in disapproval. Henry is invited to the house of his girlfriend, Mary X (Charlotte Stewart), whom he hasn’t seen for a while. A very unsettling dinner scene with Mr. and Mrs. X culminates in Mary’s mother accusing Henry of having had sex with her daughter, who we then learn has given birth to something resembling a baby. Henry and Mary are to get married and live together, with their mutant offspring, as a family.
 
It is tempting to proceed from there by saying that Henry escapes from his nightmarish existence through a fantasy world that exists inside his radiator, where a woman with oddly bloated chipmunk cheeks sings and dances, squashing sperm-like objects under her shoes. But the truth is that the entire world is a product of Henry’s buried thoughts, shifting back and forth between moments of relatively traditional narrative and those of pure striking symbolism in such a way as to seem not to be shifting at all. The dinner scene is a perfect example, taking the familiar trope of a young man’s nervousness at meeting his potential in-laws and showing what might happen if all the fear that scenario engenders was literally laid out across the table.
 
And yet this sort of analysis is actually counterproductive to experiencing the film, and may be why some people don’t care for it. (Its redolent ugliness and narrative instability certainly turn some people off, not to mention the predisposition against the avant-garde that takes care of the rest.) I came to the conclusion a while back, and have since had the idea confirmed by the experience of others, that the only way to understand Eraserhead is to stop trying.
 
Robert Phillip Kolker in his book, The Altering Eye, discussing the use of dream imagery in the work of Luis Buñuel, posits that its “primary effect is to awe and discomfort the viewer – as dreams do the sleeper.” Despite their names often being mentioned in concurrent breaths, Lynch has denied Buñuel being an influence, and, frankly, their individual methods of unsettling their audiences are different enough that I’m inclined to believe him, but at the same time there’s no question that Eraserhead is a descendant of Un chien andalou, the short that Buñuel made with Salvador Dali, in its dedication to an unharnessed subconscious, with one crucial difference, incidentally the same thing that makes me believe that those repeated accusations of Lynch being “weird for weirdness’ sake” are so very, very wrong. Buñuel and Dali deliberately set out to make a film that defied analysis. Lynch has no such intent. Yes, he may throw in the occasional tidbit of pure absurdity, but, then, random bits of oddness are one of life’s little pleasures. (I think that he would be a huge fan of a concept my friends and I enjoy called ‘small entertainments.’) But on a grander scale, he isn’t out to baffle his audience; he just isn’t interested in leading them to the light should they find it difficult to make it there themselves either.
 
And going by my own experience, I would suggest trusting the artist when he throws us into the deep end (to swap one metaphor for another). Settling into my seat at the IFC Center – second row and to the left of the screen, not a perfect vantage point, but one completely unobstructed by my fellow patrons’ heads – I was anxious but anticipatory, preparing to see the familiar images placed before me in grander a scale than ever before. After the previews (which, humorously, included one for a new Ricki Lake-produced documentary about the obstetric industry), I was seized by the opening scene, which includes a slowly elevated roar, the first of the film’s auditory assaults. I was determined to abide by my own advice, leaving aside any analysis for the duration of the screening. It wasn’t simple – those queasy sexual images are pretty hard to ignore – but as the pure power of it all overwhelmed me, it became easier, and the dream dynamic became all the more apparent. Take an easily overlooked moment such as the one where Henry first comes home to Mary and the baby; he lies across the bed, looks towards his wife trying to feed their child, looks towards the mysterious radiator…and he smiles, the smile of a new family man happy to be home. It doesn’t make much sense and it won’t last long, but for that one brief shot, the dream isn’t a nightmare of adult responsibility, but a (deeply odd) idyll of domestic bliss. And we may feel comfort and relief having transitioned from one of the more unsettling scenes with the baby to the radiator girl’s song in which she sings that, “In heaven, everything is fine,” but in the light of day we are more likely to notice how funny it is that she qualifies the symbol of paradisiacal afterlife as, essentially, adequate.

Dreams and cinema both have an active/passive dynamic, albeit different varieties. Our dreams are fully the product of our own minds, and yet, barring certain exercises the validity of which I cannot personally attest to, we have no conscious control over their content, nor any way of opting out of them aside from waking up. At the movies, we have no direct input into what flashes across the screen, but, assuming we don’t walk out, we make the conscious decision to submit our attention to what the screen has to show us. In this way, it is one of our closest approximations of a waking dream experience, and my return to the cinema, all too appropriately facilitated by Davey L. and given particular resonance through the choice of this film, was therefore deeply satisfying and also challenging. I admit it got a little rough at times – one does get used to that Pause button – but there was nothing to do but ride it out in this case. During one scene about halfway through, I began to think that, having seen the film in this intense a format, I wouldn’t ever need (nor possibly want) to watch it again, my own subconscious having acquired more than enough material to craft its own horror stories, thank you very much. And yet by the very end, after the final scene in which the screen becomes awash in Henry’s own form of bliss to the tune of a last crescendo of pure white noise, I felt electric, invigorated in a way that does not come from sleep, but only from art. Not only would I watch it again, I was ready to watch it again right then.

The Little Bad Wolf

  • Dec. 5th, 2007 at 7:34 PM


This past weekend’s New York papers brought the news that Don Imus was returning to the airwaves, after what seems like the shortest exile ever. The talking points, naturally, veered between whether he deserves to return at all and whether he will return a changed/chastened/neutered/what-have-you man. I care about all of this about as much as I care about the next round of Bimbogate, regardless of which bimbo may be featured (okay, I do have a soft spot for Lindsay), but I bring it up because I find it interesting that so many people could dedicate so much time to a topic that is all about hate speech when hate speech is something that most people would prefer to ignore in the bigger picture.
 
Despite having lived in New York for as long as I have, I’m really not that familiar with Imus. I’ve caught bits and pieces of his show from time to time on the radio and bits and pieces of his character through the press, the latter largely confined to the fact that he’s prone to saying things that are considered offensive, meaning he’s not the best of guys, and that whole charity thing, meaning he’s also not the worst. A quick survey of his controversial statements shows that he’s said some bad shit, most of it patently unnecessary and unburdened by such complicated factors as wit. (Something can be stupid and still be funny, something can be offensive and still be funny, but both? Highly unlikely. Silly and offensive I could even see making the grade; stupid and offensive, however, may be the tipping point.) But Imus seems to say what he says for the purpose of drawing attention to himself in the moment. I see insensitivity in his remarks, I see crudity in his remarks, and I see laziness in his remarks. What I don’t see, however, is any kind of overarching intent. And believe it or not that does make a difference.
 
Which is not to say that he doesn’t betray himself as someone with bigotry in his make-up, casual or not, intentional or not. And homophobia, racism, misogyny and all the other chart toppers in the Bigotry Hit Parade being the insidious forces that they are, people could argue that the simple fact that he’s putting that poisonous shit out there is bad enough, regardless of his intent. And they’d be right.
 
But it’s for precisely that reason that it baffles me a bit that this turned into such a daily update, newspapers-flying-towards-the-camera kind of phenomenon. How could this be such a shocking event when there are certain people – and I’m not going to dignify them by mentioning them by name because anyone who’s been paying attention knows who they are and those with a conscience are already nauseous at the thought of them – spewing forth hateful comments, not to mention outrageous, state-sanctioned lies, on a daily basis, and receiving no comeuppance whatsoever. And don’t even get me started on their hag queen (who admittedly doesn’t have a radio show to be fired from), who openly favors such fascist tenets as forced religious conversion and the wholesale murder of those with opposing opinions, and yet is still trotted out on a regular basis by the right as a ‘reasonable voice’ for their side. You can dislike, for example, Bill Maher’s opinions, you can call him smug (which is actually besides the point, but never mind), and you can accuse him of making the occasional tasteless joke, but you cannot, not honestly anyway, equate his overall output with that of those on the opposing side, those voices that do have an overarching intent, to transform our humanist democracy into an oligarchy fueled exclusively by money and fear. (And if you really want something to worry about, consider that these forces have been working on this transformation for at least two and a half decades now.) Until such ideological cysts are removed from the conservative movement, there will never be another truly civilized dialogue between right and left. Given the right’s new propensity for portraying itself as the (highly improbable) victim, a role that leaves little room for humility, that seems unlikely to happen any time soon.
 
So forgive me if the Imus thing strikes me a bit as concern for a stain on the wall while the floor rots out from beneath us. Disdain Imus all you want – certainly, despite what seems like genuine contrition on his part, he deserves at least some of it – but please don’t be surprised when his is not the voice that comes to blow your house down.

Halloween Report 2007

  • Nov. 2nd, 2007 at 3:14 AM

 
Well, the most wonderful time of the year (never mind what Johnny Mathis and Andy Williams would have you believe) has once again come and gone. And once again, my celebration consisted of going down to the Village to watch what little of the parade I could catch and see the costumes. What I really need is to meet someone who lives along the parade route so I can get invited up to their place and watch it from above, but until that happens, this will have to suffice.
 
Some things were the same as always. Ambling downtown one begins to see costumes in earnest starting at around Madison Square in the Flatiron District, and their numbers increase the closer you get to the Village. By the time you hit the border at 14th Street, you’re starting to get into the thick of it. And in the stretch between there and Washington Square Park, the stream is solid and steady. It then becomes a matter of choosing which street to take to Sixth Avenue in hopes of finding a vantage point suitable for watching the procession of people letting their freakier side out, i.e. doing what many denizens of the Village do every day of the year.
 
The difficulty of finding such a vantage point has often defined my trip down there, relegating my primary entertainment to observing the costumes. Now, I’m in no position to complain since I stopped dressing up several years back, and the most innovative thing I came up with in the few years previous to that was painting my face red, donning a Misfits shirt and my hot pepper chef’s pants, attaching cardboard horns to an Ernest Hemingway-style fisherman’s cap and telling people I was Satan’s cabana boy, whatever that means, but relying on the ingenuity of “the people,” as it were, has proved to be a crapshoot. I do think that attempts to do something should be commended, if only because it’s so goddamn easy to do nothing, but this year I saw a lot more outfits that seemed to consist of ‘find a whole bunch of unusual things and throw them all on at once,’ without necessarily trying to ‘be’ anything specific, and not as much of the creativity that is, after all, the most reaffirmingly human aspect of the holiday. (Keeping in mind that I’m not talking about the parade itself, and that the area I covered was but a fraction of that of the festivities, so there could have been all kinds of great stuff I missed.)
 
And then there’s the slut factor. A debate has sprung up in recent years that far too many women simply throw on a ribald variation on a classic costume and think that’s enough, while opponents argue that merely wearing thigh highs and stripper heels does not count as creativity and that it reinforces the already rampant idea that young women (getting younger every year it seems) should dress like tarts. These are not invalid points. I would, however, point out, as others have before me, that many of the women who wear these costumes would never dress like that on any other day of the year, and so, going out in public in thigh highs and stripper heels on this one day actually is somewhat daring and a liberating release for them. As to the lack of creativity, well, it’s hard to argue that one; not that they can’t be (I saw one girl this year decked out in a beautifully garish ensemble that included a foot high, purple French Revolution-era wig), but many of them aren’t. I would still come to their defense, however, if only for the simple selfish reason that I like looking at scantily clad women, and would be a fool not to be grateful to the gods of Halloween for having them spill out onto the street in such abundant numbers.
 
As to the rest of the population, even if I didn’t see anything that knocked my socks off, there were a few numbers that got me to smile. The evening seemed to be starting off with a fluffy theme as I passed a pimp with fluffy fringes all over him and a woman dressed as a sheep who left a trail of “fleece” coming off of her all the way down the avenue. I saw one man dressed as a zombie convict, whose make-up was quite good, not too gory, but menacing as hell. (Come to think of it, since he was dressed in an orange jumpsuit, there may have been a political angle to his costume; I know that anti-war/anti-torture/pro-impeachment organization The World Can’t Wait, with their symbolic orange jumpsuits, was supposed to appear in the parade, but if they did it was after I had to leave.) I saw one guy who was clearly supposed to be Hunter S. Thompson. He was carrying a grapefruit, of which I was uncertain whether it was essential or incidental to his outfit. There was a guy in a Devo outfit, circa Freedom of Choice. And I saw one guy dressed in a large plastic covering with big dots of assorted colors on him, presumably a walking game of Twister. I wonder if he was hoping that someone would volunteer for right hand red.
 
Certainly there were those who one might wish would step up to such a challenge (yes, we’re back to that). Indeed, it wasn’t long after I’d passed 14th Street that I found myself walking behind two sturdy blonde Catholic schoolgirls in heels, knee-high socks and impossibly short skirts. Additionally, not only did the volume of people in the immediate vicinity naturally slow my usual bullet train pace, allowing me ample time to ogle them discreetly, when practicality caught up with me, forcing me to relinquish my choice position and pass by them, another young woman, also in heels, knee socks and an even more impossibly short skirt, was waiting to take their place. Thank you, gods of Halloween.
 
One thing that did differ from many previous years was that I actually did find a semi-decent vantage point from which to view the parade. It wasn’t the press box or anything but at the corner of 10th Street and Sixth Avenue I found a beauty supply shop with a slight ledge just below their outside window. Standing splayfoot on that, and with as firm a handhold as I could get on a nearby frame, I could see the tops of the passing festivities. This was also one of the points where they clear a semi-circular path off the avenue and onto the adjacent streets so that passing attractions can get a bit closer to the crowd. And so, huge skeletons on sticks would lumber in and loom over the agog parade-goers, as did a variety of flying beasties, including butterflies with creepy baby faces. Then came a large contingent of angels surrounded by other winged objects: clocks, lightbulbs and toasters flew around, followed by a troupe of assorted shoes, which stopped to do a dance in the air in tandem.
 
It was while standing on that same corner that I saw probably the most morbidly heartwarming scene of the evening. A mother dressed as a murderous doctor, her white coat stained with blood, her face painted to look cadaverous, even the cornrows in her hair dyed blue, stood just beyond where I was with her son, also painted to look ghoulish and brandishing a fake machete. A pretty girl in a subtly sexy little outfit (something Disney-ish, as I recall) passed by them, bumping the fake machete and getting the all-too-real fake blood smeared on it on her arm. As they all laughed, Dr. Mother Butcher grasped the young woman’s arm, gathered up her labcoat with her other hand, and proceeded to wipe off the blood. It was a scene both gory and good-natured, a perfect amalgam of the day’s essences.
 
Some more large impressive puppets went by, as well as a group playing a zydeco theme, but I had to move on at that point, so I went back the way I had come. Predictably, when I was halfway up the block between Fifth and Sixth I heard a tremendous noise arise from either the performers or the crowd. Either way I must have missed something fairly big. I considered running to a higher street to see if I could catch whatever it was, but that Fifth-Sixth block is lo-o-o-ong, and I was already running late for somewhere I needed to be, so I decided to forget it.
 
On the way down the crowd had seemed a bit thinner than usual at first, and I feared the turnout might not be as good this year, but thankfully those feelings were soon dispelled. Additionally, I was pleased to note that the number of costumes remained fairly high as I made my way the forty or so blocks back uptown, higher than usual even. This made me feel good. You might say, well, if the sight of other people in costume does you so much good, why don’t you dress up yourself? It’s a fair question, and one for which I don’t really have an answer, although I would imagine it’s related to the part of me that, while I don’t really enjoy going to parties myself, enjoys walking by a building and hearing the sound of other people having a party.
 
Much later, I went out for my nightly constitutional, hitting a deli on 81st and Third to get a beer and then swinging over to Second to see if I could spot any straggling celebrants coming out of the bars. And sure enough, like a Halloween coda, there was a group of four across the avenue, all in costume, though I could only make out two of them. One of the guys was dressed as the Flash and one of the girls was Alice in Wonderland, all grown up, which remains, all unpleasant innuendo about Lewis Carroll notwithstanding, one of the all-time slutty classics. I appreciate costumes that display the imagination of the wearer, but I also appreciate those that display other things. I do have my own imagination after all.
 
Until next year…

Persian Shorts (The Non-Bunching Kind)

  • Oct. 28th, 2007 at 3:15 AM


I spent a part of last weekend attending the first year of a new film festival, the International Short Film Festival: Independent Films on Iran. I was connected with this festival, as I have worked for the founder for many years and helped to assemble copy for the website and catalog. There were basically two ways for a film to qualify for this festival: anyone of Iranian heritage could submit a film on anything, or anyone of any heritage could submit a film, provided that film was somehow related to Iran or Iranian culture. The whole idea behind this was to shine a spotlight on Iranian culture as a means towards dispelling some of the misunderstanding about the country that is still all too prevalent here. I admit that I thought the criteria might turn out to be a bit limiting at first, but they managed to put together a really interesting line-up of films. We’re hoping this first year was successful enough to attract sponsorship sufficient to make it an annual event.
 
The festival was made up of eight different film blocks: two retrospectives, one showcase of shorts from Tajikistan and Afghanistan, and five blocks of films composed of submissions for the competition mixed with award-winning shorts acquired for the festival. I was only able to make it for two blocks (and I missed the last two films in the first block and the first film in the second), but here’s a quick rundown of the ones I saw (the more recent ones are the submissions and the older ones are the award winners, just in case that isn’t readily apparent):
 
Bistoon & Its Secrets (2007, 6 min., D: Katayoun Afrooz) Pseudo-mood piece about Bistoon, a mountain in western Iran that is revered both for its place in folklore and the examples of ancient Persian art carved into it. Effective, but at six minutes long it all flew by all too quickly.
 
Broken Column (1964, 18 min., D: Houshang Shafti) A documentary that, purely through imagery and voiceover recitation of old texts, portrays the fall of a Persian dynasty and the destruction of its capital, Persepolis, by Alexander the Great. I have to admit that the voiceover kind of lost me after a while, but the photography more than made up for it. Favorite image: a sudden thunderstorm breaks out and we watch stone carvings of men on the side of a wall turn dark as the water pours over them.
 
The Rhythm (Hossein Tehrani and His Drum) (1971, 9 min., D: Manouchehr Tayyab) The first half of the film is basically just Tehrani doing his thing with his ‘tonbak’ (a Persian goblet drum), which is fine, but kind of depends on your tolerance for drum solos. But even the disinclined would enjoy the second half in which his rhythms are juxtaposed with images of a train barreling along its route.
 
Iranian Miniature (1958, 20 min., D: Feri Farzaneh) Documentary about the history of miniature painting in Iran. Interesting for art historians, and the work itself is quite beautiful. My only beef would be that, since all of the paintings are shot in close-up, one never really gets a sense of exactly how big a “miniature” is.
 
Malek Korshid (1975, 16 min., D: Ali Akbar Sedeghi) Thoroughly charming animated film tells (wordlessly, and with a wink) the legend of a prince who sees the portrait of a girl and decides he must find her. He subsequently travels through distant lands, encountering assorted obstacles, including a cat demon (which he fells, but ends up having to fight all over again when its ghost appears) and a dragon whose roar is effected with the trumpet of an elephant. Full of humor and clever visual devices, such as the opening scene of the prince and his page opening doors in the castle in various inventive ways, including one which is opened by taking a bird out of a key and putting it in a cage set into the door.
 
Mosque Sheikh Lotfollah (1972, 15 min. D: Manouchehr Tayyab) Another documentary from the director of The Rhythm, all about a mosque in the city of Isafahan. Again, the photography was something to look at, but the narration was almost exclusively about the architecture, which simply isn’t one of my favorite subjects.
 
The Mozart Minute: A Typical Viennese Scene (2006, 1 min., D: Houchang Allahyari) One segment from a compilation film in which twenty-six Austrian-based directors each submitted a one-minute film about Mozart. In this case, director Allahyari gives us a Persian family having a picnic by the Wien River while one of them plays ‘Eine Kleine Nacht Musik’ on the tar. Delightful.
 
Persian Tree (2006, 17 min., D: Hassan Naghashi) The history of Iran as told by an ancient, massive cypress tree that has not only seen it all, but has been an integral part of it. I probably would have gotten more out of this is I knew more than the very little I do know about Iranian history, but, still, a feast of visuals. Favorite part: when the tree talks about how people have cut off some of its many limbs to plant in the four corners of the country as a tribute, and details what happened to them, as a parent would about its children.
 
Just Waiting (2006, 11 min., D: Hamy Ramezan) Fictional account of an Iranian boy who is stuck in a Yugoslavian refugee camp circa 1990 with his father, the two of them having made their way there from Iran, as they wait to see if the UN will allow them to be deported on to the next country. As the boy waits out his encampment, rooting for his favorite football player and finding a Playboy hidden under a mattress, the director emphasizes his point of view by keeping things on his level…literally. The camera stays low and the faces of the adults generally stay out of view except for a few moments, including a crucial one near the end. The threat of the life they lead, being surrounded by criminals as well as fellow refugees, seems slightly removed, which makes the climax all the more startling, when the desperation of the inmates (and the strange equality that desperation instills whether they desire it or not) suddenly leaps out at us.
 
Night Story of the Boulevard (2007, 23 min., D: Mehran Valipour) The subtitles for this one would definitely have been benefited from a going-over by someone with a stronger grasp of English, but this was still an interesting piece, playing out a midnight streetside encounter between three parties: two city workers, one of whom is trying to work up the courage to ask his girlfriend to marry him, a couple of criminals with a body in the trunk of their car, and a man on his way to a rendezvous who can’t find his destination. This was the most Western-stylized offering out of the films I saw (except for Security, although that’s because that is a Western-produced film) with a diverse pop soundtrack and the assorted scenes repeated and played out from different vantages. It was also pretty damn funny.
 
Pedal Around the World for Peace (2006, 27 min. D: Behrooz Afrakhan) Documentary about two Iranian cyclists who determined to bike through as many countries as would allow them in order to spread a message of peace from the Iranian people to the rest of the world. Ultimately they made it through a remarkable number of nations, despite minor inconveniences like being turned away at the border of some countries (including China) and not-so-minor ones like being mugged in South Africa. A genuinely uplifting human interest story that plays out a bit dryly as presented; more like something you’d see on CNN.
 
Reza Lost in Time (2007, 28 min., D: Nader Davoodi) The director takes a look at his brother, who left Iran to make it in the West, by shooting scenes of his life in New York, interspersed with footage of his family members back in Iran sounding off on his ambitions. This film hit a more personal note for me than any of the others because I know the subject. He and I used to work together at the same video store (owned by the founder of the festival), and a significant portion of the film was shot inside the store, although it was in the early hours before I ever arrived. There’s even a scene in which Reza banters with a customer, the sort of affected twit we got in there all too frequently, as she argues with him over the price to dupe a tape of a concert she’s recorded off HBO. (Funniest moment- Twit (as she sees the camera): “Are they shooting me?” Reza: “No, it’s okay, they’re shooting me.”) This is the sort of scenario that was teeth-grindingly annoying at the time, but is funny in retrospect. Again, I’m admittedly biased, but I thought this was a funny and poignant piece.
 
Security (2007, 19 min., D: Matthew Linnell) The only film in the festival to fit the second criteria (non-Iranian director, but film deals with Iran in some way) was adapted by Israel Horovitz from his own play. Two homeland security officers at JFK, one of whom is in a funk over his failed marriage, go head to head with an Iranian woman and her young son. The woman speaks no English, the son only a little, and they are on their way to meet up with the husband/father, a university professor in Buffalo, where, we are told, there has been suspicious activity. Things, not surprisingly, do not go well. The film is rather funny near the beginning, and one of the little jokes actually precipitates the bad stuff that follows. A pointed look at how minor factors can easily cause serious damage in this era of heightened paranoia and xenophobia, though the outcome is left deliberately vague. The director is apparently developing it into a feature, which I could see working but could also see detracting from the story’s potency. Time will tell.
 
Underneath My Father’s House (2006, 15 min., D: Naser Zeraati) Right after the Iranian Revolution of 1979, we are told, there was a period of relative freedom, but it wasn’t too long before the hardline Muslims decided all that leftist open society stuff couldn’t possibly be good for people and the crackdown began. Iranian intellectuals, fearing reprisal, would often burn their books and their own personal writings. The director, optimistically believing the bad times couldn’t last for more than a year at most, buried his books and journals in the basement of his father’s house. Over twenty years later he returns to dig them up. The film is deceptively simple, but makes its points. (There is even a moment of humor similar to the one in Reza, when the director, buying a ticket in a train station in Sweden where he now lives, is told that the people with him can’t film there and he replies, “It’s okay, they’re just filming me.”) One might not believe without witnessing it what a sense of tragedy could be wrung from the simple image of him and his friends trying to open the books and watching them crumble into so much mulch, time and dirt having done what they kept the mullahs from doing.

A “Bones” to Pick

  • Oct. 25th, 2007 at 2:56 AM

 
Man, with snappy wordplay in my titles like that, I don’t know why the pop culture rags aren’t beating down my door to get me to work for them. Oh, yeah, that’s right. They have no idea who I am.
 
And even if they did, they’d find that I’m not nearly as savvy about the current zeitgeist as I used to be, although I still watch a fair amount of television and subsequently pick up dribs and drabs. This also affords me the occasional opportunity to see the “mainstream” deal with “fringe” culture, and if there’s one thing that has remained consistent over the years, it would be how it deals with it, to whit, poorly.
 
I could grouse about the way the mainstream continuously portrayed all punk-rockers as sub-moronic thugs…up until the point where it was decided that their culture was suitably profitable to be co-opted into the corporate stew and rebranded as “hip,” provided you left behind all of those messy social and political philosophies they had always pretended didn’t exist anyway, but the fact that I have yet to see them get it right once makes that whole schmegege almost more comical than anything else. And speaking of comedy, let’s take a look at our actual subject: a recent attempt by primetime television to tackle the sticky (sometimes literally) subject of fetishistic sexual practices.
 
A brief aside from Professor Pervert, just in case there’s anyone reading this who needs to be schooled: these days, the words “fetish” and “kink” are used interchangeably, although technically they’re not the same thing. Fetishism requires fixation on a specific object or objects, whereas a kink tends to be situational. However, given that so many situational kinks involve specific gear, it’s not difficult to see why people meld the two, and not wholly unreasonable for them, as I will do here for the sake of simplicity, to do so, except in the strictest of semantic senses. Although we all know how important strictness is in fetishistic sexplay.
 
Now, you see what I did there? I made a cheap joke that is actually also a perfect example of the sort of thing indicative of how little most people know about fetishism. Say the word and most will conjure up images of S&M/B&D. Dominance play may be the largest and most visible of subcultures, but it’s far from the only game in town. There are a variety of interests that many probably wouldn’t ever guess could be sexual in nature. (Some of which undeniably shouldn’t, but I’m not going anywhere near that. Everything to which I refer is legal, consensual, and safe (the latter provided a certain level of responsibility in some cases).)
 
Part of the problem as far as mainstream exposure is concerned is that these unusual practices are almost always trotted out for laughs, with the occasional message about individuality thrown in for good measure. The humor thing doesn’t bother me, per se; many fetishes are funny. I happen to have one in which humor plays a fairly substantial role (he said cryptically). The problem enters when the suggestion arises that fetishes are nothing but “silly little things,” and that they couldn’t possibly have any deeper meaning for a person beyond a psychological hang-up that they must, of course, work hard to overcome.
 
And so, from the Close But No Cigar Department, we have the recent episode of the show Bones. Bones stars the very alluring Emily Deschanel as Dr. Temperance Brennan, a forensic anthropologist whose specialty is analyzing the title organs recovered at crime scenes, and the work she does solving crimes for the FBI along with her crack team of other specialists and her Fed partner Seely Booth, played by David Borenaz of Angel fame. The episode in question featured a body found near a resort that turned out to be a gathering place for people into “pony play,” in which couples come together, one playing the groom and the other playing the equine. Unsurprisingly there were a plethora of jokes (the victim turns out to have gone by the name ‘Mr. Ed’), and yet at the same time, as befits a show about an anthropologist, there was an attempt to view it from a cultural perspective. The wisecrackery naturally came from Booth (who frequently comes off as kind of a dick, as far as I’m concerned, whether the writers intend him to or not) while Brennan looks at it analytically. (There’s a running joke in the series about how clueless she is about popular culture, if I may return to an earlier theme, and it seems she’s equally out of touch with the contemporary habit of mocking anything that doesn’t fall within one’s immediate experience.) This was a refreshing change, which made it all the more of a pity when, in the final scene, Booth gives a speech about how empty the fetishist’s experience must be, and how owing to a lack of emotional context all they’re having is “crappy sex.” The character’s exact words.
 
*sigh* Where does the hate come from? As is likely apparent, what they’re pushing here is the age-old “sex is always better when it’s with someone you lurv” meme, which, for the most part, I don’t have a problem with. (Any more than I have a problem with encouraging abstinence in our youth, provided we’re savvy enough realize that many of them aren’t going to listen. But I digress) But it’s not enough, in this case, for the character to be pro-love; the writer, whose name I ‘m not even going to bother looking up, felt that he needed to be anti-kink. And it stems, it seems to me, from the same sort of thing men often accuse women of doing: equating sex with love. And it’s not any truer in this case than it has been in any number of ill-advised one-night stands that have taken place over the millennia.
 
Having sex with someone for whom you have deep feelings may make it a more rewarding experience emotionally, but it doesn’t automatically make it more pleasurable in a physical sense. On the other hand, realizing a fantasy that is hardwired into your brain can increase physical pleasure considerably. Think about it this way: most people talk about sexual fantasy and its attendant quirks as being all about escapism. But a true fetishist, one who is psychologically attuned enough to his/her own desires, is actually not escaping from anything, but rather far more fully embracing a part of themselves that many don’t have to courage to face up to. (Mini-rant: It is an unfortunate fact that even in this advanced day, the extreme Puritanism that has had far too vocal a presence in this country still causes people to associate all sexual desire with shame, subsequently lumping perfectly harmless aberrations in with the truly unhealthy ones; on the other side of the coin, the backlash against said Puritanism has led to such over-the-top phenomena as the Girls Gone Wild videos, in which young women (with no small degree of help from alcohol) are encouraged to embrace the idea of debasing themselves as some form of rebellion. Way to go, Puritan assholes.) It is exceptionally rare to find this sort of acknowledgement in popular culture. Off the top of my head, I can only think of one film that ends by reaffirming the fetishist’s personal choice not to shy away from their true nature, and that would be Steven Shainberg’s daring Secretary with Maggie Gyllenhaal and James Spader. That their two characters end up accepting who they are and finding true love in the process is likely the sort of thing of which David Borenaz’s character from Bones couldn’t even conceive, because when he looks, all he sees is “crappy sex.” Which, when you think about it, says far more about him than it does the people he so judgmentally dismisses. But because his character gets the last word, it ends up having a resonance in the context of the episode that it doesn’t really deserve.
 
Good thing I’m here to set things right with the world, no?

So, in short, embrace your otherness, let your freak flag fly, and all the rest of it, not only because it's more honest but because you may end up having better orgasms, too. A healthy outcome all around.


Continuing from a previous post where I posted some lyrics with supernatural content written for the now defunct Nancy Sumatra (I do miss it sometimes)...

Now...supernatural content is a somewhat amorphous thing, as is the supernatural in general, I suppose, so your mileage may vary, but let's just roll with it and see what we roll over, shall we?

First up is a song I wrote in regard to the wooded areas surrounding Drew University, a.k.a. The University in the Forest, which is kind of stretching it a bit. The wooded areas on campus are nice, but in order to get lost in them, the sort of lost that the word forest conjures up, you would have to be really drunk. Or really small. Beyond campus is another matter, so I suppose the argument could be made that the "forest" refers to the widespread surrounding area, but why am I still talking about this? One portion of the wooded area was called the 'Arboretum.' and during my time there, some nearby development seemed to be gradually making its way into that particular area, so I dreamed up the the idea of unnamed activists rounding up the people responsible and effectively turning them over to the spirits of the wood, who turn out to be a little pissed off, although the lyrics are clearly just as influenced by the occasional fatties my friends and I would pass around in that wooded area as much as anything else. This is one of my personal faves, and we made a pretty good studio recording of it too, which would have been even better if we had ever had the chance to add the monster noises for the grand finale that we had planned to.

After that comes another personal fave, and definitely one of the best songs we ever wrote: 'The Bride of Frankenstein.' Basically I took the tack of positing the James Whale movie that we all know and most of us love as a fever dream the good doctor has as the result of pre-wedding jitters, jiiters he fears are destined to drive him back into his god-playing ways. This also has a very good studio recording, marred only by what marred almost all of our studio work: the fact that I was forced to stand as still as possible in front of the mike and was therefore unable to contort my body in a way that allowed me to shriek effectively. Still, a good'un.

The second two cross the supernatural with the religious (and I'm not, for the nonce, going to get into whether that's a redundancy). 'Penitents' is told from the point of view of an entity who has been adopted as a deity by an unspecified group of worshippers, while 'The Tie That Cried' sprang from a piece I read about icons that exhibit signs of "wonders." (I was particularly struck by the story of a Pittsburgh businessman whose purportedly found tearstreaks on the bust of a geisha he owned the day after Hiroshima was bombed, and that gets referenced in the song.) Ultimately the song became more about how religion somehow drifts further away from the idea of people, but I don't know that it's a point quite coherently made. A studio recording of 'Tie' does exist and came out fairly well as I recall, but unfortunately we only made it far as an instrumental of 'Penitents.' I think I made a go of it or two, but it was a taxing song vocally under the best of circumstances and that whole 'standing as still as possible' thing killed it. I had planned to give it another go but hadn't gotten around to it by the time those sessions folded, probably from lack of funds. Too bad too, 'cause that was a rocking song.

Anyway, here they be (in reverse alphabetical order, just to screw witcha):


The Tie that Cried
 
He bought it in a thrift shop, he thought of it as kitsch
His wardrobe was so boring, it made a welcome switch
But as he walked down the street, they eyeballed him, enraptured and upset
So he stopped and he stood and he looked down and his shirt was soaking wet
 
He said ‘don’t stare at me’
But still they stared at him
You see, he was wearing the tie that cried
 
Then he thought ‘maybe I’ve got something here’
 
He brought it to his colleagues, saying ‘you’ve not seen the like
This will now be my status, I can sell that motorbike’
A beloved face adorned its front and it glowed from hem to hem
And when two or more were gathered together, it wept with the best of them
 
He said ‘hey look at me’
And so they looked at him
You see, he was wearing the tie that cried
 
Bronze geisha weeps at Hiroshima’s death
Worshipper swears that she feels the Virgin’s breath
Holy man levitates for the crowd, confirming ancient lore
Long thought dead saint appears at the local convenience store
 
Blood and sweat and tears
Been seen throughout the years
An answer to our prayers
Confirmation of our fears
 
The followed him to a vacant lot
And they laid all their cellphones at his feet
Then they agreed, as it has been written,
In this dusty temple they would continue to meet
 
They weren't quite looking at his face
No, their gaze fell somewhere south of that
It was then that a little doubt crept into the back of his mind
'I wish I'd bought a bleeding hat'
 
He said 'hey worship me!'
And they did worship him
The perfect altar sitting beneath the God
That was the Tie that Cried


Penitents
 
Soaring cross the mountains, scoping out the land
My powers may be limited but I’ll enjoy them while I can
Skirting conversation, skimming ‘cross a lake
Scorning all the false ones swimming in my wake
 
I know where I am going, I know why I must go
I am singular of purpose, fanatically so
 
Arriving at the circle, basking in the glow
Swaying to the hymn beats asking to make it so
Sucking up the gravy, tearing at the meat
Drooling on the penitents praying at my feet
 
I am on Easy Street right by The Chosen Lane
I will turn the ritual sacred into the rite profane
 
Forgetting something, what could it be?
Does it really matter while I still am Me?
Can’t be denied I’m Me
Still eating at me, something has got to give
Oh god, I just remembered, it’s ‘cause of them I live
Without them I can’t live
 
Fortunately, it’s not that much of a problem…
 
Crazy as a bedbug, this one who calls me ‘Lord’
But he knows what he’s doing, makes sure I never get bored
Simpatico relation, don’t think I’m going out on any limb
Saying that he needs me as much as I need him
But NO!!!
 
I don’t need anyone! Not while I am everything!
They’re free to sing their praises to me, so let their freedom ring!
 
Forgetting something, what could it be?
Does it really matter while I still am Me?
Can’t be denied I’m Me


The Bride of Frankenstein
 
It’s happening again, when will I ever learn?
I played God in the lives of men and now the whole damn place will burn
 
You see a man, he came to me and I believe he was quite mad
He said you’re settling for domesticity, I think that’s awfully sad
Your wondrous work’s the same as mine, it’s for what you sweat and bleed
You say it’s for your fiancée you pine, but I know what you really need
It’s off the power that you feed
You gave this wondrous creature life
Now let us build for him a wife
 
And then I woke up with a scream
I woke up from the dream
 
I woke up next to you
You looked so peaceful though the wolves still howled outside
Your beautiful face should be enough for me
And yet these feverish visions still haunt my mind
 
And so I turned on a life that was near blessed and got just as mad as he
I know I never should have acquiesced but he held captive my bride to be
And so we stitched and sewed in place, poured electricity through every seam
But when we finally put them face to face all she would do was scream
And when I saw his face, well, my heart near bled
And then wisdom came from his patchwork head
He said, “You go and live! We belong dead!”
 
He pulled the switch that would ignite
And the explosion filled the night
 
And now I lie here in fright while your breath so softly caresses your pillow
I know you’re everything that’s good for me and yet I can’t deny
The hunger lurks in the back of my mind
And now I fear that Prometheus is going to be reborn again
 
IT’S ALIVE!!!!!!
 
It’s alive, a thriving franchise
For Chaney, Jr. and Cushing, Carradine and Lugosi
And even the Japanese will get in on the act eventually
And maybe someday Sting or Kenneth Branagh will play me


Arboretum
 
Gravel tongue rolling to the temple door, hello, come in
Funny-named wingers hope I see you flying high
 
Hear us, Artemis and you, Uncle Remus
Heed your tireless toilers to vanquish all the spoilers
 
Pudding skin breaking dirty under my footies feel so nice
Egg yolk eye cooking on the icy hot water say ‘Hey, hey’
 
What are they doin’? Raise altars to ruin
They may say it’s progress, nature’s under duress
Feel your ancient bloodline, feel it course on through mine
Vengeance you will mete’em, save the arboretum
 
Fallen wooden god doin’ time as a table for four at the grass buffet
Fuzzy waiter brings us the check and I smile and say ‘put it on my acid tab’
 
It’s gotta be done, it might even be fun
We must stop construction, time to try abduction
Curse them ‘cause we oughta, take’em ‘cause we gotta
Taking just one more step to leave on Momma’s doorstep
 
Can you hear it? Comes the vengeful spirit
Heinous was the assault, grievous be the result
Time has come to worry, sorry we’re not sorry
Ghosts are here to meet ya, someone wants to greet ya
 
Funny-named wingers hope I see you again flying so high
Egg yolk eye cooking on the icy hot water say ‘Bye bye’
Say bye bye